Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:39679)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCMGclZyxExD0vob0BBoEL2YrnA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1R8UVo-0008IU-QO; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:03:44 -0700
Received: by wyh11 with SMTP id 11sf11608928wyh.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=xfx7LTyad1fU1S2fg5lhuOvp2WNY/rBjYlYXy0qzkDo=;
        b=HeWBls9+tsDxsENjoQCAvJO+GLSB89Zl9wQnAQDl+OOEonTHGVRJfQxKuKokQzhxI7
         5FGq+Nx5mInATc0zwTqQrmmzhjnfobBPwzoDntmBtrazBfjyCfFao2FhEI8BTO2KfmGg
         hZofAlnoBzaAi9jW68Ty5hcPRxGB52+r5UnDg=
Received: by 10.216.181.82 with SMTP id k60mr3255997wem.3.1317117812105;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.216.206.224 with SMTP id l74ls4943003weo.2.gmail; Tue, 27 Sep
 2011 03:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.186.78 with SMTP id v56mr684330wem.11.1317117810790;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.186.78 with SMTP id v56mr684329wem.11.1317117810770;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f178.google.com (mail-wy0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fg13si11091095wbb.0.2011.09.27.03.03.30
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.178;
Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so8154918wyf.23
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.60.132 with SMTP id p4mr7231570wbh.40.1317117810515; Tue,
 27 Sep 2011 03:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.63.8 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110927095409.GF28218@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <3b5e0b1d-a58d-44ac-ae3f-a46ccdb2a8ed@t11g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
	<CAGO2uOMF=XZ02uEALEBM8G_4ALk5nBSZB5nwK0E-7wZz9ZkLhQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110927093105.GD28218@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
	<CAGO2uOO43L+Jk_+foADkvMfhYpYqd2M=_v3JdCaKz98K+qLyZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110927095409.GF28218@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:03:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGO2uOOX5CguX4TjqaPh7GgarVhwvKmJQ6X-Loo1BdOL4zoYUw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] English
From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: escaaape@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=escaaape@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

I was meaning that in semiotics, it is considered you have a
syntactic, a semantic, and a pragmatic level.

You can have ambiguity in all of these.

Incidentally, syntax is itself connected to lexical matters and
morphology, and these are connected to phonology (some theories mix
them in a whole), so you could also find amibguities in those.

The example you gave is anaphoric ambiguity.    Sure Lojban has
anaphoric ambiguity, its logical-predicate-structure allows it.    Yet
I tend to think a *lexical* ambiguity would be more rarely produced,
-- if ever.

--esc

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.