Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:62713) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R9U8W-0004lJ-Vt; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:50 -0700 Received: by fxg17 with SMTP id 17sf3148881fxg.16 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=H0J0QrKqtBYv5UvsKTcmM3dlsDJzHwIi7cEYW6wyAgs=; b=l8X7sXT62iVgr00uxnJq5RFgTM8KHumwo4PLNwRRD2Fkj9wgIJFYu4PE33yk2eTUL5 +9b/7KQRt+OG31N9M+viUvaOxpZiJ/Uh1L7RWNRRRHVUN/omls5nutGCOixpsQcUrpbF E4hZdSYl9N88EaD91N55P5YNEtozOtYTtzh1Y= Received: by 10.223.39.22 with SMTP id d22mr1928448fae.44.1317354694816; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.134.87 with SMTP id i23ls1171522bkt.2.gmail; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.156.138 with SMTP id x10mr905747bkw.17.1317354693429; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.156.138 with SMTP id x10mr905746bkw.17.1317354693406; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a4si1617463fad.3.2011.09.29.20.51.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.53; Received: by mail-fx0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 2so2653601fxh.26 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.56.81 with SMTP id x17mr682313fag.5.1317354693266; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.41.68 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25314851.4130.1317353559542.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcr11> References: <25314851.4130.1317353559542.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcr11> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:51:33 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] roroi From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517448454890ccc04ae208a95 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --001517448454890ccc04ae208a95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Because pavroi is a lujvo, but roroi is a cmavo cluster. Also, pavroi and paroi are equivalent in meaning. On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:32 PM, djandus wrote: > So, a morphology question: why does pavroi use pa's rafsi but roroi doesn't > use ro's? I would have thought that any PA word would follow the same > rules... > > ki'u ma zo roroi na pilno lo rafsi be zo ro .i zo pavroi pilno lo rafsi be > zo pa .i mi jinvi lo du'u ro cmavo be ma'oi pa. cu se pilno ta'i pa tadji .i > > mu'o mi'e djos > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/cKsCC4DbzXQJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001517448454890ccc04ae208a95 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Because pavroi is a lujvo, but roroi is a cmavo cluster.

Also, pavro= i and paroi are equivalent in meaning.

On= Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:32 PM, djandus <jandew@gmail.com> wrote:
So, a morphology question: why does pavroi = use pa's rafsi but roroi doesn't use ro's? I would have thought= that any PA word would follow the same rules...

ki'u ma=A0zo roroi na pilno lo rafsi be zo ro .i zo pavr= oi pilno lo rafsi be zo pa .i mi jinvi lo du'u ro cmavo be ma'oi pa= . cu se pilno ta'i pa tadji .i

mu'o mi'= ;e djos

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/cKsCC4DbzXQJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'= e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. m= i patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )<= br>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001517448454890ccc04ae208a95--