Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:54398)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCKH6vKekGBDrtt70BBoE2rXp0w@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1REXJs-0001EG-6V; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:16:27 -0700
Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3sf2840521ywm.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-originating-ip:subject:from:to
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=skg01YBamyq0n1h/34pvTYOJlAVXhWqKbM73VCfQNAk=;
        b=okBtqvI3E8ppkS2maK9+ajxVD7TYuz8FRknXF9ksodAOV8ZzP/djJ9td891eiGQSnT
         X/Ak2VDjepM3NWW57P1Dp86oexLaRskGAlPPFtNcYOcqMP8NmRKOulKpU4smvUeBjUYk
         Zea8jdPj9og8/mEPKPS6a6oLKTsiRC4JSjpgw=
Received: by 10.236.190.229 with SMTP id e65mr1583215yhn.6.1318558571134;
        Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.101.205.40 with SMTP id h40ls10435837anq.7.gmail; Thu, 13 Oct
 2011 19:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.185.197 with SMTP id u45mr8990708yhm.6.1318558570354;
        Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.185.197 with SMTP id u45mr8990706yhm.6.1318558570346;
        Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fagricipni.com (fagricipni.com. [69.5.18.101])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id n38si1006866ybb.0.2011.10.13.19.16.09;
        Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of lojban707@fagricipni.com designates 69.5.18.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=69.5.18.101;
Received: (qmail 12754 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2011 02:16:09 -0000
X-Originating-IP: [67.58.190.131]
Subject: Re: [lojban] fagricipni's Translations #1
From: "H. Felton" <lojban707@fagricipni.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj2QoyMtg-qAV9RDuYC7dhL618Rt--Ut-=kpXaYwH9jLyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0bee931d21bbb12d49b2029731cfac07.squirrel@QuestMail.FutureQuest.net>
	 <CAKOEKkSQwZXqp=qK8u_Tyh0UQmkKtr+5qW7ODzrvDsKN9q-g+A@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAMKwHj2QoyMtg-qAV9RDuYC7dhL618Rt--Ut-=kpXaYwH9jLyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:50:20 -0400
Message-ID: <1318557021.1886.10.camel@fagricipni-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1
X-Original-Sender: lojban707@fagricipni.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of lojban707@fagricipni.com designates
 69.5.18.101 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban707@fagricipni.com;
 domainkeys=pass header.From=lojban707@fagricipni.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

I've re-read http://dag.github.com/cll/5/7/

On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 11:13 -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> You don't need the be'o. 

This bit is accurate; though.

> It's only required when linking multiple sumti, or in other words,
it's only needed when using bei.

But, according to the discussion after 
this example(http://dag.github.com/cll/5/7/#e10 ), your rule is 
not entirely accurate; there are other cases where the "be'o" 
cannot be elided.  Since this is the case, I will include 
"be'o" in at least some places where it could be elided until I 
fully understand the rules for its elision.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.