Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:49754) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1REfBi-0005KR-62; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:40:32 -0700 Received: by wyh11 with SMTP id 11sf4509890wyh.16 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:40:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SvS2a1hSnpvxJUgFBujAyP8ZIeQblNj+PgsKTh6NPh0=; b=InVVYUNTRuFmJ2Dlpoq30r527khdmkd3X/D+PbAl28ULYz2tV1vVN/PaqFQTm7DjP9 e9nrcVzQ6PpME7RlTEO9pbXKXEoftnHUh+xdBgSYMpmIFVsbqdlR9K3uc3F8cSut2aJr qp+xNCf73p1NPoZ4hQmjtUGARbFqsXgXOOJpo= Received: by 10.216.230.139 with SMTP id j11mr508062weq.22.1318588796692; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:39:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.38.21 with SMTP id z21ls6993343wbd.2.gmail; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.2.129 with SMTP id 1mr32203wbj.5.1318588795873; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.2.129 with SMTP id 1mr32202wbj.5.1318588795857; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com (mail-ww0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d7si4613812wbp.2.2011.10.14.03.39.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.49; Received: by mail-ww0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 9so640168wwg.18 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.143.72 with SMTP id t8mr2644051wbu.95.1318588795708; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.69] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fo7sm13375050wbb.20.2011.10.14.03.39.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E981179.1030805@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:39:53 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/3.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable References: <1318202744.44997.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111013043308.GD3367@gonzales> In-Reply-To: <20111013043308.GD3367@gonzales> X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Martin Bays, On 13/10/2011 05:33: > To take a simple example: when the {lo} is read generically, what does > {lo remna cu prami ri} mean? There are two obvious possibilities > - "humans love humans" (both generic) and "humans love themselves". The > first is natural only if we admit kinds. The debate may have moved on, but back in the day, I'd have understood it t= o mean "the human loves themself" (or, equivalently, "the human loves the h= uman", just as "John loves himself" and "John loves John" are equivalent in= logic or Lojban), i.e. a reading in which the two obvious possibilities yo= u mention are in fact nondistinct (because there's only one human). It's tr= ue that, given that "the human loves themself", one is unsure whether one s= hould infer that "humans loves humans" or that "humans love themselves", bu= t that is a metaphysical matter rather than a linguistic one, and hence not= something for Lojban or Lojbanology to address. > (For nastier a example, consider the apparently classic {ro te cange poi > ponse lo xasli cu darxi ri}... although I'd be happy simply considering > this to be meaningless) Do you mean the Lojban is meaningless, because of the inadequacy of the rul= es for identifying and interpreting the antecedent of {ri} (in which case I= 'm sure you're right)? The proposition intended by donkey sentences is easy= to grasp, and pretty commonplace, but hard to formulate in ordinary logic;= a logical language should find a way to render the proposition into logic = and express it succinctly. --And. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.