Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:47066) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RF6VA-0001Ra-0i; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:50:26 -0700 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4sf1184185pzk.16 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:50:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key :x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=+EvC5F4MdxaPqLvDUQucsnZhdLKRWak6HCeituiLbAk=; b=fDNBzQmk1slKVFovGny3h1N/39Wzgf1vvsjwxJL13uatUYCtdtrMTVgBrNoQSZ+w+m GOJM0GZD79JJ2IcFzZQ7AZmHeWtpXonWZ9vCGNtw5Hdm4CeceOoyPwQnFTRVAQmwCdQM a6aPwDqa5JHYt4Xms1GF04XPMi+674Xaey9Cs= Received: by 10.68.46.7 with SMTP id r7mr133988pbm.18.1318693811325; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:50:11 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.33.194 with SMTP id t2ls13376395pbi.0.gmail; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.38.134 with SMTP id g6mr18044902pbk.6.1318693810193; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.38.134 with SMTP id g6mr18044901pbk.6.1318693810185; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lf12si12682323pbb.2.2011.10.15.08.50.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19; Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9FFo9EI015636 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:50:09 GMT Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1RF6Uz-0007Lf-2i for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:50:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:50:09 -0400 From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable Message-ID: <20111015155009.GA5916@gonzales> References: <1318202744.44997.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111013043308.GD3367@gonzales> <4E981179.1030805@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: gusni User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Saturday, 2011-10-15 at 12:16 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:39 AM, And Rosta wrote: > > Martin Bays, On 13/10/2011 05:33: > > > >> (For nastier a example, consider the apparently classic {ro te cange p= oi > >> ponse lo xasli cu darxi ri}... although I'd be happy simply considering > >> this to be meaningless) > > Do you mean the Lojban is meaningless, because of the inadequacy of the > > rules for identifying and interpreting the antecedent of {ri} (in which= case > > I'm sure you're right)? > I would say the Lojban is meaningful and (roughly) equivalent to > "every farmer who is a donkey-owner is a donkey-beater". i.e. equivalent to {ro te cange poi ponse lo xasli cu darxi lo xasli}? Would you similarly say that {mi cpacu lo plise gi'e ba bo citka ri} is equivalent to {mi cpacu lo plise gi'e ba bo citka lo plise}, and that any deduction that the same apples are involved is an informal pragmatic one? Generally that {zo'e noi broda ku'o ri} =3D=3D {zo'e noi broda ku'o zo'e noi broda}? Such a rule applied universally would make handling anaphora much easier (though admittedly only by pushing more under the rug of pragmatics). It still leaves super-donkey sentences like {su'o da poi te cange cu ponse lo xasli noi da darxi .i ri se kecti mi}, where simply copying the {lo} with its relative clause to the second sentence would give an unbound {da}. Assigning no meaning to such expressions seems reasonable. (Although of course simply adding {je} or {bo} after the {i} would give a meaningful expression, which in this case would have something close to the intended meaning) > [snip] > =3D ro te cange cu darxi ro xasli poi ri ponse ke'a Nice. Martin --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6Zq7AACgkQULC7OLX7LNbXFQCaAxmVWEEZpW+9mR2pdmP9TveY ePEAnR4eSOVSPGITsMwWgP43z/0NRmi/ =8m8m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--