Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:50355) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RFG76-0004oA-TZ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:06:19 -0700 Received: by yws29 with SMTP id 29sf1782325yws.16 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:06:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:subject:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7O6kP2iyhbdHv2udhQv5NIRvJvCmGtTPx0t4As50aPY=; b=z9CGWlIFY+eLQu29AxAUL+CgUdqkKFRQg0dlzRzw6UoIqZ4vEEo7LOmpEa+iy8YTvn gg+xlpF5JO4m6ZRugHUz4icojyzA3MHW/+80+3Wx9MtthhGdMhyvCeMX0rWAGJDrWRQT qGiAfkSdr8Qf3y+RtPFdNs5SCupJJMrqezC9Q= Received: by 10.151.101.4 with SMTP id d4mr1031027ybm.2.1318730760184; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:06:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.59.3 with SMTP id m3ls18060050ank.1.gmail; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.145.138 with SMTP id p10mr18259912yhj.3.1318730759580; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.145.138 with SMTP id p10mr18259911yhj.3.1318730759570; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm3-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm3-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.237.136]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id r12si102543ybi.3.2011.10.15.19.05.59; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.136 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.136; Received: from [66.94.237.194] by nm3.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Oct 2011 02:05:59 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.116] by tm5.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Oct 2011 02:05:59 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Oct 2011 02:05:59 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 293415.35020.bm@omp1021.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 76592 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Oct 2011 02:05:59 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: D5f_mf8VM1mc8mpWj8d.ih8h3HPtf6zbehEL5RqgMh7xB.J HfhWs7REgdyMhDeRahGI3XP.aEVtv1n7t6ypAf.w6uWYlWVDwaActqy4ddVz mh1yDTCCqz5XX.ROwOnnfHrmTwqne1SnC01HWXucvj_AAyoBdFvPXCUMAYDS xz.pNIgGTrCWztUuIXMVE4D6IoYaVa0CkRD0D5RUTdOVRygCwuhm9Iqa8xn2 BFQzRNcTCd2A33fMTcfa_aahDSxsnDlJEMuEZeG4SEyueBHdi4oyrnQ8d9WB Zue5lJOzlV2loocKF.4tNvOlDOZoZSG_6TVJpVwBFw30T9JPDpu1_5GgBlYI _Mnkz0B3TLwmdnQwjeacpoLzg5F_g119nWa_B0dxocJ4UtuwBXyWT5DLJj3q spyeWuq8tehcJR4oOBdVSFWePrNHN8mDbYiVqQ.l809Cc2QaKOko4_Fac0Tb VSBR2 Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:05:58 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/574 YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 References: <4E981179.1030805@gmail.com> <20111015155009.GA5916@gonzales> <20111015185726.GC3779@gonzales> <20111015203444.GD3779@gonzales> <20111015221511.GF3779@gonzales> <20111015232240.GG3779@gonzales> Message-ID: <1318730758.48510.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:05:58 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: <20111015232240.GG3779@gonzales> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.136 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Using {zo'e} seems a bad plan, given that it is inherently ambiguous (or=20 undetermined). ----- Original Message ---- From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, October 15, 2011 6:22:40 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural= =20 variable * Saturday, 2011-10-15 at 19:29 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Martin Bays wrote: >=20 > >> >> > > > {su'o da poi te cange cu ponse lo xasli noi da darxi .i ri se > >> >> > > > kecti mi} > > > > Oh, I see. So you don't have the first sentence explicitly having the > > meaning that the farmers hit the donkeys which they own, just that they > > own donkeys and hit donkeys. >=20 > Right. That's why I said that with "poi" instead of "noi" it would be > a different matter. Notice that in English you said "hit the donkeys > which they own" rather than "hit donkeys, which they own", so you are > talking as if it was "poi".=20 I don't see how using {poi} could rule out this constant interpretation. For each {da}, the kind 'donkeys' does satisfy {da darxi ke'a}, so how can the {poi} clause exclude it? It could *suggest* that the {lo xasli} should be interpreted more specifically, I suppose, but I don't see why it should do so any more than the {noi} clause. > (In fact I'm never quite sure about what to do with "poi" when it is > not being used to restrict the domain of a quantifier.) Quite. If it does do anything, there's also the issue of which gets priority in {ro lo broda poi brode}. > > Similarly, in {so'i da poi te cange cu darxi lo speni be da}, > > {lo speni be da} could have constant referent the kind 'humans'? >=20 > "lo speni be da" is "zo'e noi speni da". I don't see how you could get > rid of the unbound variable there. There's no referential "lo speni" > in the non-referential "lo speni be da". OK, but if {lo speni be da} =3D=3D {zo'e noi speni da}, then we have a situation analogous to that above - with {zo'e} in place of {lo xasli}. {zo'e} can be taken to referential, for example with referent the kind 'humans', which does indeed satisfy {ke'a speni da} for each da. > > Given this, I'm now slightly surprised that you're willing to allow {lo= } > > to ever give a Skolem function rather than a constant! >=20 > If the selbri that "lo" transforms into a sumti contains an unbound > variable, then I don't see how "lo" can create out of it anything > other than a function. So am I taking "{lo} -> {zo'e noi}" too literally? Martin --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.