Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:59396) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RFaeQ-0005k5-BL; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:02:00 -0700 Received: by yws29 with SMTP id 29sf2995273yws.16 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:01:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=QXzzztUZFx8i7vBpQXRja6+3G2KtDRyey8U2lIzE31M=; b=Rq5QfOxSYd41/vy8/s3tPbwNHLK6nyHxPUUdgu0wO9s4SCjyGEgsa9L+p+ONrQlSSC PlQyzIuNczDUHz2n18Y4TQfGc2v5l62JAVn9M+iBuVpPnX6X5aREHIx8mhKFSwum74tn 14ajV9rQKYm7EzqQVhSLsujNhXxUXfjHMnLNk= Received: by 10.150.1.2 with SMTP id 2mr844570yba.3.1318809705261; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:01:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.150.26.33 with SMTP id 33ls14956063ybz.2.gmail; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.119.201 with SMTP id n49mr24822921yhh.0.1318809704159; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.119.201 with SMTP id n49mr24822919yhh.0.1318809704148; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com (mail-gx0-f174.google.com [209.85.161.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z70si3609697yhn.5.2011.10.16.17.01.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.174; Received: by ggnb1 with SMTP id b1so2214777ggn.33 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.192.197 with SMTP id i45mr22766220yhn.128.1318809704055; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:01:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.95.44 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:01:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111016235259.GE21114@gonzales> References: <20111015185726.GC3779@gonzales> <20111015203444.GD3779@gonzales> <20111015221511.GF3779@gonzales> <20111015232240.GG3779@gonzales> <20111016222320.GD21114@gonzales> <20111016235259.GE21114@gonzales> From: Luke Bergen Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:01:24 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30564307efc3d404af734fdc X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf30564307efc3d404af734fdc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I still don't see the problem. "roses are red" and "red things are roses" both imply that "SOME Xs are Y" since after all, there are yellow roses and red fire trucks. On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > * Sunday, 2011-10-16 at 18:41 -0400 - Luke Bergen : > > > On Oct 16, 2011 6:23 PM, "Martin Bays" wrote: > > > * Saturday, 2011-10-15 at 19:22 -0400 - Martin Bays : > > > > So am I taking "{lo} -> {zo'e noi}" too literally? > > > > > > Actually, what do you make of this argument for not taking it too > > > literally: > > > > > > {lo rozgu cu xunre} > > > == {zo'e noi rozgu cu xunre} > > > == {zo'e rozgu gi'e xunre} > > > == {zo'e xunre gi'e rozgu} > > > == {zo'e noi xunre cu rozgu} > > > == {lo xunre cu rozgu} > > > > What's wrong with that? The rose is a red thing. The red thing is a > rose. > > I don't see what the problem is > > Those two sentences aren't generally considered equivalent in english. > > Moreover, xorxes would give "roses are red" and "red things are roses" > as possible translations. Those are even more clearly non-equivalent. > > Martin > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --20cf30564307efc3d404af734fdc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I still don't see the problem. =A0"roses are red" and "r= ed things are roses" both imply that "SOME Xs are Y" since a= fter all, there are yellow roses and red fire trucks.

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
* Sunday, 2011-10-16 at 18:41 -0400 - Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>:

> On Oct 16, 2011 6:23 PM, "Martin Bays" <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> > * Saturday, 2011-10-15 at 19:22 -0400 - Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>:
> > > So am I taking "{lo} -> {zo'e noi}" too lit= erally?
> >
> > Actually, what do you make of this argument for not taking it too=
> > literally:
> >
> > {lo rozgu cu xunre}
> > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {zo'e noi rozgu cu xunre}
> > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {zo'e rozgu gi'e xunre}
> > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {zo'e xunre gi'e rozgu}
> > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {zo'e noi xunre cu rozgu}
> > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {lo xunre cu rozgu}
>
> What's wrong with that? =A0The rose is a red thing. =A0The red thi= ng is a rose.
> I don't see what the problem is

Those two sentences aren't generally considered equivalent in eng= lish.

Moreover, xorxes would give "roses are red" and "red things = are roses"
as possible translations. Those are even more clearly non-equivalent.

Martin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf30564307efc3d404af734fdc--