Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:34731) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RFbP4-0005xP-VG; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:50:14 -0700 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf4428134bka.16 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:49:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sCwrSe4odzqCVppvXnEw2v/5G23LQuAZCVjMHjdMa5A=; b=BkpP9j2LW9KbIEXtFeltPDLqAF9rXPs9sCO23gbuFWsucUg2Ib2zPDvnD6GR5ZGUK9 vFMqV7zmwpTlZU+RMMt3gtwEl8THWIOkBtUUWC3q6omjPldzASgti+vJxN9Jf4g4Pu5h IYmu5bl4ESu3HgSyqhvGABzW4z8CSD+/rC/a4= Received: by 10.223.62.77 with SMTP id w13mr836743fah.9.1318812596679; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:49:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.240.17 with SMTP id ky17ls1236060bkb.3.gmail; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.136.216 with SMTP id s24mr1844161bkt.5.1318812595667; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.136.216 with SMTP id s24mr1844160bkt.5.1318812595636; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n1si2740641bkn.1.2011.10.16.17.49.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.44; Received: by bkas6 with SMTP id s6so4584714bka.17 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:49:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.17.3 with SMTP id q3mr20859684faa.28.1318812595456; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.39.35 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:49:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111016222320.GD21114@gonzales> References: <20111015155009.GA5916@gonzales> <20111015185726.GC3779@gonzales> <20111015203444.GD3779@gonzales> <20111015221511.GF3779@gonzales> <20111015232240.GG3779@gonzales> <20111016222320.GD21114@gonzales> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:49:55 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > * Saturday, 2011-10-15 at 19:22 -0400 - Martin Bays : > >> So am I taking "{lo} -> {zo'e noi}" too literally? > > Actually, what do you make of this argument for not taking it too > literally: > > {lo rozgu cu xunre} > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {zo'e noi rozgu cu xunre} Where the referent of "zo'e" is roses, yes. > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {zo'e rozgu gi'e xunre} > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {zo'e xunre gi'e rozgu} > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {zo'e noi xunre cu rozgu} So far so good. > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {lo xunre cu rozgu} But "zo'e noi xunre" could be changed to "lo xunre" only if the referent of "zo'e" was red things. We already know that the referent of zo'e in all the previous sentences was roses, so we can't transform "zo'e noi xunre" into "lo xunre". Alternatively: "zo'e" is not like "ko'a", something that gets a referent and keeps it more or less indefinitely. The referent of "zo'e" gets assigned by context, and the sentence in which it appears is very much part of its context. "lo rozgu" =3D=3D "zo'e noi rozgu" only in the context of defining "lo rozgu". With a different context, "zo'e" might get assigned a different referent and thus "zo'e noi rozgu" might no longer be replaceable by "lo rozgu". (All of which may amount to saying that "{lo} -> {zo'e noi}" should not be taken too literally, and "{zo'e noi} -> {lo}" is even less certain.) mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.