Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:53279)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDBmfj0BBoEqoqdEQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RGJA3-0002aw-W5; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:33:38 -0700
Received: by wwg7 with SMTP id 7sf1877295wwg.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=cvN8GV1F98jT602TSZB0YtJsTlMGV1Irv7+px9bMWx4=;
        b=c3s9NzDSlDxZ7hKAWMACu2kGJ8YiG6n06mewPpMN/RsDNvlD5I+dBb8Jji97NlkhgM
         +jeJ/IKSpTfdJNBWzSzz3N58Lct+mbPBAHTp69Cx3CGy0/CZGXrJdgzzdC0dLW1JjBu+
         r2AHyGlyitKW5CWWTEO27wMhFb0LOk6NYEPHY=
Received: by 10.216.229.195 with SMTP id h45mr1519669weq.0.1318980801694;
        Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.53.196 with SMTP id g44ls365000eec.0.gmail; Tue, 18 Oct
 2011 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.10.85 with SMTP id 61mr319032eeu.4.1318980800709;
        Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.10.85 with SMTP id 61mr319031eeu.4.1318980800688;
        Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f177.google.com (mail-ey0-f177.google.com [209.85.215.177])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x14si2021717eef.2.2011.10.18.16.33.20
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.177;
Received: by mail-ey0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 3so1315099eye.36
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.91.143 with SMTP id n15mr1779167fam.23.1318980800503; Tue,
 18 Oct 2011 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.13.231 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20111018225736.GA5069@gonzales>
References: <20111013043308.GD3367@gonzales>
	<4E981179.1030805@gmail.com>
	<20111014225934.GC3111@gonzales>
	<4E98D899.7080608@gmail.com>
	<20111015200404.GB3090@gonzales>
	<4E9A39C9.3010605@gmail.com>
	<20111016050503.GA21114@gonzales>
	<4E9B77B1.2050608@gmail.com>
	<20111018032657.GO21114@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2c8zzaBavOTuwUexkodvAdCMz=jQpnBp-TA+EyNzz_g0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111018225736.GA5069@gonzales>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:33:20 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2ei46ruT9=4A_aFshKfC9HLVCXgVB+NZkr3L46LbX_EHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.177 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> I agree that it isn't perfect terminology, because what's on the kind
> end in one situation might in other situations be on the mundane end,
> and vice-versa. Whether or not there are 'absolute mundanes' isn't
> really important - it's the mixing of the levels in a single {lo}-phrase
> that causes the problems.

That almost sounds like something I would say! I agree you shouldn't
mix levels in the same lo-phrase. Any resolution into lower levels you
may want to do has to come from something outside of the lo-phrase,
the lo-phrase will only provide the uppermost level for any given
situation.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.