Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:44807) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RGbhg-0002hO-7S; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:35 -0700 Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24sf3289294wyg.16 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UamIaWut7zbhlacIz8X7GDJE6EH6R1J19/0I7XC0ASs=; b=kZSrm07n0xd3eT0/u6Y1GSjZ9Y889Dn8YfDs7yDqaUIaemNBdNDFZFU/DMqeKXjSS4 O4tTN2pWd/ZuVs8xZ3MzwLG5fswkP15Lj70pSvAtB/y0nlTqcK7Oc75hpwbdk5FSB23C t8uZiSM8b16GBXi1vDHQbqWw6jasT9WDRW3zU= Received: by 10.216.2.69 with SMTP id 47mr2661991wee.4.1319052077910; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.200.140 with SMTP id ew12ls5458809wbb.3.gmail; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.174.77 with SMTP id s13mr138419wbz.4.1319052076692; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.174.77 with SMTP id s13mr138418wbz.4.1319052076668; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f178.google.com (mail-wy0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fd1si3308828wbb.0.2011.10.19.12.21.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.178; Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so2587283wyf.23 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.36.212 with SMTP id u20mr586267wbd.69.1319052076450; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cpc1-pres4-0-0-cust401.pres.cable.virginmedia.com. [80.193.151.146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o17sm9629770wbm.6.2011.10.19.12.21.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9F2328.4040000@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:21:12 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/3.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable References: <1318202744.44997.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111018033124.GA30548@gonzales> <4E9E3C5F.2000606@gmail.com> <201110190014.14668.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Luke Bergen, On 19/10/2011 05:23: > And Rosta: > I think it would be good to have other gadri based on a model in > which there are no types, only instances. > > > I'm only barely able to follow this conversation me too! > but couldn't that be > what "le" is thought of as? My understanding of "le" is that you must > have an actual broda in mind. I don't know the technical definitions, > but that sounds like it could be thought of as an "instance" to me. No -- firstly because "le broda" points to a specific thing, but not necess= arily to an actual broda, hence its equivalence to "lo co'e voi broda", whe= re co'e gives the specificity and voi gives the nonveridicality (the not ne= cessarily actually being broda); and secondly because in the types-only mod= el, everything that is an actual broda is a type. But one can be hopeful that Martin can outline for lVi an instance-only sem= antics, which perhaps the BPFK might consider. --And. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.