Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:39695) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RHDqE-0001uZ-Pq; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:04:58 -0700 Received: by wwg7 with SMTP id 7sf6526957wwg.16 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:04:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=0kl1GAqXb+rlEe7d1/WWEZXnbVgEExPSFnjhJaH/who=; b=t8j7ieJX8W1Pw2626PbtkSEdxLZcH9ZtGVbsYRCwVGPdTNNfphCmqKQLzJe9Maj3Wd igA90BGZJiV72AKzWg72kVadLYQYLmOlaR6QhB1oy06+uKGe0chyic/5PFbcL5EEtfzB O78bIAA+37hkzMnGNfABSlZ8S0FaDM+B+KGN4= Received: by 10.216.229.35 with SMTP id g35mr721696weq.18.1319197933139; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:52:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.148.207 with SMTP id q15ls10739054wbv.5.gmail; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.20.73 with SMTP id e9mr485906wbb.5.1319197932138; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.20.73 with SMTP id e9mr485905wbb.5.1319197932122; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t38si2809331wbo.2.2011.10.21.04.52.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.45; Received: by wwf5 with SMTP id 5so4453659wwf.2 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.203.69 with SMTP id e47mr9801990weo.60.1319197931828; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.75] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gd6sm21356772wbb.1.2011.10.21.04.52.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA15CE9.3000900@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:52:09 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/3.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable References: <1318202744.44997.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <201110201551.34676.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4EA0D3C2.4050708@gmail.com> <201110202325.23106.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20111021041242.GC28229@gonzales> In-Reply-To: <20111021041242.GC28229@gonzales> X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Martin Bays, On 21/10/2011 05:12: > * Thursday, 2011-10-20 at 23:25 -0400 - Pierre Abbat: > >> On Thursday 20 October 2011 22:06:58 And Rosta wrote: >>> When I was last up-to-date with developments, nothing was official, but I >>> think I can recall the rudiments of our best efforts at that time to >>> construct a consistent and rational gadri system. As far as I now recall, >>> "half an apple" would be "lo pi mu plise", while "pi mu lo plise" would be >>> the "one in every two apples" one. >> >> If "pimu lo plise" means "one in every two apples", then "pa lo plise" should >> mean "every apple". I think "lo pimu plise" is "a half apple" > > But {lo PA broda cu broda} is meant to be a tautology. Half-apples > aren't apples. So {lo pi mu plise cu plise} fails that test, but {lo pi mu djacu cu djacu} passes it. Following a line of thought that that observation initiates, I note that by the Goatleg rule, {su'o plise} is okay but {su'o djacu} is not and would instead have to be {za'u djacu} or {ci'i djacu}. --And. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.