Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:41161) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RHIRP-0005Eg-R9; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:59:44 -0700 Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24sf6821492wyg.16 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:59:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=2KanOrcBsOGkvC+ZnFULF32jXNAa2kUJCNvYOlnih+0=; b=VRe92UMvb2JyqkiQn24I0keDm5yRSyjMOrNaQbfrtMdH+gV2jUigd0+HbQW3iAlAJj MG7KkfXHi5FNFY7xoK9IGmEwN8d/PYGdLFpZK1T0XuPOaHnQ8QFna3q7s/oms5uNwMfh AF4ziyZ3fBs8WCYjbXyxuzm52vUjLUeT+GdtQ= Received: by 10.216.138.136 with SMTP id a8mr3225759wej.1.1319215999598; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.91.77 with SMTP id l13ls11768021wbm.4.gmail; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.230.19 with SMTP id i19mr386430weq.10.1319215998429; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.230.19 with SMTP id i19mr386428weq.10.1319215998410; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f171.google.com (mail-wy0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k17si37457wbo.1.2011.10.21.09.53.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.171; Received: by mail-wy0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 11so6813442wyi.16 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.132.134 with SMTP id o6mr10187666wei.93.1319215998251; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.75] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l42sm3891237wbn.16.2011.10.21.09.53.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA1A37B.4010905@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:53:15 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/3.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable References: <1318202744.44997.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <201110201551.34676.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4EA0D3C2.4050708@gmail.com> <201110202325.23106.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20111021041242.GC28229@gonzales> <4EA15CE9.3000900@gmail.com> <1319211343.75477.YahooMailRC@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1319211343.75477.YahooMailRC@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / John E Clifford, On 21/10/2011 16:35: > I don't see why; {djacu} is as quantized as every other Lojban predicate. You don't agree that half an amount of water is also an amount of water? --And. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: And Rosta > To: lojban@googlegroups.com > Sent: Fri, October 21, 2011 6:52:09 AM > Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural > variable > > Martin Bays, On 21/10/2011 05:12: >> * Thursday, 2011-10-20 at 23:25 -0400 - Pierre Abbat: >> >>> On Thursday 20 October 2011 22:06:58 And Rosta wrote: >>>> When I was last up-to-date with developments, nothing was official, but I >>>> think I can recall the rudiments of our best efforts at that time to >>>> construct a consistent and rational gadri system. As far as I now recall, >>>> "half an apple" would be "lo pi mu plise", while "pi mu lo plise" would be >>>> the "one in every two apples" one. >>> >>> If "pimu lo plise" means "one in every two apples", then "pa lo plise" should >>> mean "every apple". I think "lo pimu plise" is "a half apple" >> >> But {lo PA broda cu broda} is meant to be a tautology. Half-apples >> aren't apples. > > So {lo pi mu plise cu plise} fails that test, but {lo pi mu djacu cu djacu} > passes it. > > Following a line of thought that that observation initiates, I note that by the > Goatleg rule, {su'o plise} is okay but {su'o djacu} is not and would instead > have to be {za'u djacu} or {ci'i djacu}. > > --And. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.