Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:48135) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RHhDh-0001J6-6W; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:27:10 -0700 Received: by qadb10 with SMTP id b10sf2889002qad.16 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:26:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-yahoo-newman-property :x-ymail-osg:x-yahoo-smtp:references:in-reply-to :x-apple-yahoo-original-message-folder:mime-version:message-id:from :x-apple-yahoo-replied-msgid:subject:date:to:x-mailer :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yecv9dazdw9CB1I2GQgTJwgOXKLk3XaXRRCsIk7KQXo=; b=52InRy0xlNtppLu7zk/GIXD61AE9i8nDnKw8q27Om+/aGmsVzAHsgc439y9lbsQkiN c4FxveJ2Mv0w3dAUqGhxt3+jKKGSaW48uKL9hP34iWfkJ4QAHXWTkUPr+FpABsKgxyaq QJfqMLT+omcW4ENvgejt7pIdubsJZR5XcfWEY= Received: by 10.224.187.9 with SMTP id cu9mr2148360qab.12.1319311612169; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:26:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.182.71 with SMTP id cb7ls10805601qab.4.gmail; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.198.6 with SMTP id em6mr12998135qab.0.1319311611579; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.198.6 with SMTP id em6mr12998134qab.0.1319311611569; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com. [98.139.52.202]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id s41si8721012qcq.3.2011.10.22.12.26.51; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.202 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.52.202; Received: from [98.139.52.195] by nm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Oct 2011 19:26:51 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.185] by tm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Oct 2011 19:26:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1068.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Oct 2011 19:26:51 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 425630.60428.bm@omp1068.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 44585 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2011 19:26:51 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: q.jYrBIVM1lNJR7t_.cRv3b7FmdcAe2vumPkONFAZ2a3B5g L0flrMsCWFLcAYEV7jxJm68jRJAvLQpNyPWy9p33SwnG5tN1KOr35u9kpt8F FyXRsYOimyrc0s3.NdeBL4O7SrkbK3zhsnFIsNGJsxybnif9J8QfuQjO.bNB A9GuEHxq7BZ_WOfBgUNGlDGqi9mcGoZybrkMyt6CNOn.MOyjvwCyDNLfGWJp mDtjzTuTSNlGnpdJT461LDU0l7_rHgJIPsg7kBLkg4kNyQbupyN97PrcQgG7 CIn3P3_DADR0BFgXdHP0gCcSvDBZhEwFYT_B2oDT15UB0TaGg45dh1Kn3tGg mJyipHyh9sR.H1n.k45Wtiel9kQiVYbNk7G4oZHRNTpxfrCERRtG5iztv2T6 IPsWi7xU8GDUI9rwJOkY_oJxs7kT1TQrbtaz75d9Y05yP0rDyTYCoKrLrrbD kSj.fAHrB4NkqbEHZVekx9zdzjVB8mm9PuPs7MlNXKzVOUqD5nuD_hY8yAQv fB2oMDQovwQjhVxSqDuU31F0rhDkNo44PLQ5_HHp.RC15xUu9_HADWUcGCmt Pqlad_uRB6FOLGSAI2SWCJRsMzARJwYq4uV.GtA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- Received: from [192.168.1.68] (kali9putra@99.92.108.41 with xymcookie) by smtp115-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2011 12:26:51 -0700 PDT References: <1318202744.44997.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <201110201551.34676.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4EA0D3C2.4050708@gmail.com> <201110202325.23106.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20111021041242.GC28229@gonzales> <4EA15CE9.3000900@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: AAlojbanery Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8G4) Message-Id: From: "John E. Clifford" X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 1_10663467_AHbHjkQAAAjhTqHqWQOy4RGDD18 Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:30:53 -0400 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8G4) X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.202 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Well, you would, of course. But a Classifier that is only implicit, never overt, is somewhat suspect linguistically. And that view does go against 55 years of history (with occasional odd moments). Sent from my iPad [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kali9putra[at]yahoo.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.8 DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours before Received: date -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Well, you would, of course. But a Classifier that is only implicit, never = overt, is somewhat suspect linguistically. And that view does go against 5= 5 years of history (with occasional odd moments). Sent from my iPad On Oct 21, 2011, at 17:55, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:52 AM, And Rosta wrote: >> Martin Bays, On 21/10/2011 05:12: >>>=20 >>> But {lo PA broda cu broda} is meant to be a tautology. Half-apples >>> aren't apples. >=20 > Unless you use a Banach-Tarski knife to cut them in two. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach%E2%80%93Tarski_paradox >=20 >> So {lo pi mu plise cu plise} fails that test, but {lo pi mu djacu cu dja= cu} >> passes it. >=20 > What about: >=20 > lo pi mu grana cu grana > lo pi mu pluta cu pluta > lo pi mu girzu cu girzu > lo pi mu pagbu cu pagbu > lo pi mu namcu cu namcu? >=20 >> Following a line of thought that that observation initiates, I note that= b >> the Goatleg rule, {su'o plise} is okay but {su'o djacu} is not and would >> instead have to be {za'u djacu} or {ci'i djacu}. >=20 > Instead of saying that all Lojban predicates are count, I'd rather say > that they are all mass, and that quantifiers induce an implicit > classifier on them, which is often context dependent. >=20 > mu'o mi'e xorxes >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an?hl=3Den. >=20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.