Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:37650) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RHyKW-0003I0-Bn; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:20 -0700 Received: by wwg7 with SMTP id 7sf10656312wwg.16 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7zjK29JYz12A54YfIbLvKRmIXPfEUyNDE9fnf6HFNUg=; b=TUcRDd+KrYLV+B9QCkEBTW2qn+T1gUZvuQhS1YjORF0vi2eLZzUuqz64SOofhf6eQ+ Ac5TvwmHg37n6Ly82hBqnufoZPFVVUmdtl0at3/cFF8gWiDv6rsrYNmzJXRuQCsNQFDk yLVjhhDPyKmt/mzkz1zbhjyJjmz2lt7AiMtnE= Received: by 10.216.182.79 with SMTP id n57mr661510wem.11.1319377382053; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:02 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.148.207 with SMTP id q15ls15884454wbv.5.gmail; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.147.138 with SMTP id l10mr621722wbv.9.1319377381115; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.147.138 with SMTP id l10mr621721wbv.9.1319377381083; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (mail-wy0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fd1si9839149wbb.0.2011.10.23.06.43.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.175; Received: by wyg19 with SMTP id 19so5550421wyg.6 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.27.67 with SMTP id h3mr8038385wbc.30.1319377380890; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.75] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff6sm2593061wbb.10.2011.10.23.06.42.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA419DE.5000505@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:42:54 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable References: <1318202744.44997.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <201110201551.34676.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4EA0D3C2.4050708@gmail.com> <201110202325.23106.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20111021041242.GC28229@gonzales> <4EA15CE9.3000900@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Jorge Llamb=EDas, On 21/10/2011 22:55: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:52 AM, And Rosta wrote: >> Martin Bays, On 21/10/2011 05:12: >>> But {lo PA broda cu broda} is meant to be a tautology. Half-apples >>> aren't apples. >> So {lo pi mu plise cu plise} fails that test, but {lo pi mu djacu cu dja= cu} >> passes it. > > What about: > > lo pi mu grana cu grana > lo pi mu pluta cu pluta > lo pi mu girzu cu girzu > lo pi mu pagbu cu pagbu > lo pi mu namcu cu namcu? I agree with you that the answers to these questions reside in the semantic= on entries that the lexicon entries point to. =20 >> Following a line of thought that that observation initiates, I note that= by >> the Goatleg rule, {su'o plise} is okay but {su'o djacu} is not and would >> instead have to be {za'u djacu} or {ci'i djacu}. > > Instead of saying that all Lojban predicates are count, I'd rather say > that they are all mass, and that quantifiers induce an implicit > classifier on them, which is often context dependent. As usual, I agree with you. So, as John said, adjectival glosses are genera= lly preferable, out of context, to nominal ones, e.g. "is human" rather tha= n "is a human". --And. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.