Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:61441)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCKyEq_TBFBD8wJX1BBoE2UcD5A@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RIK4z-00029e-A6; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:56:41 -0700
Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14sf6036634vcb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references
         :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=x9+d4T8qHViyHpTC6jtPT5YSM3LGCFTwqIrLPjjcYp0=;
        b=mv8l6ORxrnNbKNXK72d6MjZ8Cs+BgXKOjxrawteZ0y42zEfrFN0Oa8pGab0ISG9HL8
         8r8kDZoJodlaRxRQW81SUKuWRc+T+Xj2jsdlEgdlW6bpoay236T4aqAbtBvso9PNWwKq
         QKa9glRK3lJTcuXgPvjq1YiY5xxgWg64Bsi50=
Received: by 10.220.150.17 with SMTP id w17mr1859699vcv.53.1319460988314;
        Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.24.1 with SMTP id t1ls3997659vcb.4.canary; Mon, 24 Oct
 2011 05:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.193.202 with SMTP id dv10mr131681vcb.4.1319460987667;
        Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Muhammad Nael <muhammad.nael@gmail.com>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <12044470.729.1319460986934.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbza28>
In-Reply-To: <1319423266.86720.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <4ae1bfdf-61ba-4539-84e0-0a56a67480fd@u13g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <17558590.1835.1319383267925.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbl36> <CALm==BXsSBMcSBDWD1NvwU362WH4RHfcC+YJaFtRisa=WhDEuA@mail.gmail.com> <201110231635.52021.phma@phma.optus.nu> <CALm==BV1iB+8droOQ-oNAAX568y70=8r4HaeAoYJCKjtoyCFFA@mail.gmail.com> <CALBXrCvzoozL-_S1ogXgeNnwUje-p7Q_j90F3XHRX=XgNF92Eg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1319423266.86720.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: lojban and PR
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: muhammad.nael@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 muhammad.nael@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=muhammad.nael@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_728_8264047.1319460986933"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_728_8264047.1319460986933
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Matt:

 The word 'Lojban' has a meaning in the language itself... As I've given my 
opinion that even the word list should be redone, I make it clear that I did 
not mean that Lojban should be changed forever with the current version 
buried... I meant that it should be used as a 'template' for a third version 
of the logical language... It took about 30 years to make Loglan, another 15 
to get the final face of Lojban we see today *built* upon Loglan... And I 
imagine it would take 5 years to make LoCCan-3 or whatever it could be...
---
Clifford:

> Hard line to draw between making up a new language and getting clear about 
> the 
> one we have.  The history of the latter enterprise, for example, has often 
> looked like the former, and, to a lesser extent, conversely.  I suppose 
> intention is, if not all, the major criterion.

 
 I needed 2 reads to get this! And I could understand Bilbo easily, no 
offence.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/5ThYTTY7w4EJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


------=_Part_728_8264047.1319460986933
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Matt:<div><br><div>&nbsp;The word 'Lojban' has a meaning in the language it=
self... As I've given my opinion that even the word list should be redone, =
I make it clear that I did not mean that Lojban should be changed forever w=
ith the current version buried... I meant that it should be used as a 'temp=
late' for a third version of the logical language... It took about 30 years=
 to make Loglan, another 15 to get the final face of Lojban we see today <i=
>built</i>&nbsp;upon Loglan... And I imagine it would take 5 years to make =
LoCCan-3 or whatever it could be...</div><div>---</div><div>Clifford:</div>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0=
px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-=
left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex=
; ">Hard line to draw between making up a new language and getting clear ab=
out the&nbsp;<br><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"text-align: left=
; ">one we have. &nbsp;The history of the latter enterprise, for example, h=
as often&nbsp;<br></span><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"text-ali=
gn: left; ">looked like the former, and, to a lesser extent, conversely. &n=
bsp;I suppose&nbsp;<br></span><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"tex=
t-align: left; ">intention is, if not all, the major criterion.</span></blo=
ckquote><div>&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;I needed 2 reads to get this! And I cou=
ld understand Bilbo easily, no offence.</div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/5ThYTTY7w4EJ">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/5T=
hYTTY7w4EJ</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_728_8264047.1319460986933--