Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:56632) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RIfhV-0003QP-3S; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:01:56 -0700 Received: by qadb10 with SMTP id b10sf533918qad.16 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:01:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=1GW09kpYRquRcXT8oX8Je40ok/gYIRY9JMBRCdj9xkc=; b=1WhX1fGAh+8gs84Z/40RlBlabuJ40CJD4wTmriI5WaDlI1oXqp9HDR/M+bxqOjpJkH phY8/R5KDSMc3XWkm4kjiahj1IH1/KvL1mdUoEkYHm0m2+KDF1hD88asj4hAwsg74J3w Rpdx6QJZEKfhwOo+TSirrYYaKRKNF0sJVhhmw= Received: by 10.224.10.16 with SMTP id n16mr5479982qan.4.1319544099853; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:01:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.203.195 with SMTP id fj3ls14774894qab.5.gmail; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.9.194 with SMTP id m2mr4413862qam.8.1319544099391; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.9.194 with SMTP id m2mr4413861qam.8.1319544099383; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com. [75.180.132.122]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id j6si13272382qct.1.2011.10.25.05.01.38; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.122; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=xpiJhaXcY9g2L5+PPpDCkNh+KVu4STcfCxbrT9KJo/A= c=1 sm=0 a=6ti_TD8eFm8A:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=p7DlWOZAidfQabii3YIA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=cco-Uqy6GSkA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:57407] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id D3/8B-02292-225A6AE4; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:01:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195D91A34D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:01:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] random things Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:01:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <3497227.889.1319103620656.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqgd7> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201110250801.21340.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Tuesday 25 October 2011 07:44:23 Michael Turniansky wrote: > > Assuming {mi drani}, does it then make sense to use relativised pro-sumti > > inside modally connected bridi, like so: > > {mi djuno do .i fi'o se banli bo do pendo ce'u} for > > "My knowing you has greatness in property being-befriended-by-you" > > which is a really obscure example, I know, but bear with me here. Does > > that construction make sense? > > No. As it says in Chapter 9, the end of section 8: > > Note: Due to restrictions on the Lojban parsing algorithm, it is not > > possible to form modal connectives using the ``fi'o''-plus-selbri form of > > modal. Only the predefined modals of selma'o BAI can be compounded as > > shown in Sections > > 7a > >nd 8 > > . Camxes accepts it, so it's a limitation of LALR. Pierre -- gau do li'i co'e kei do -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.