Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:64210) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RIjVo-0006fe-GA; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:06:07 -0700 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16sf480153vws.16 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:05:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-yahoo-newman-property :x-ymail-osg:x-yahoo-smtp:references:in-reply-to :x-apple-yahoo-original-message-folder:mime-version:message-id :x-mailer:from:x-apple-yahoo-replied-msgid:subject:date:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=90re0kcTMZd+h88GqjJFNdxn9fv4+krrt9mOs43YlXM=; b=QvXdcZb1QFzWAqrfP0dTi4dUy6Amged/E4W2NlWflp8znbFg1XadjIazIxCqXmXJ7Z HqFD4PJk6spNcZUWiNS7iye3WGSlikINbRqi49dgRrjmZBWwWliVOqwCi/FxQMV+OiqB 6g7bWqGSmqHRtSZ6zcuhcO4KXGNtXPb6eKVjE= Received: by 10.220.151.79 with SMTP id b15mr41963vcw.5.1319558751066; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:05:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.28.171 with SMTP id c11ls12792186vdh.1.gmail; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.39 with SMTP id iv7mr27330606vdb.7.1319558750407; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.39 with SMTP id iv7mr27330604vdb.7.1319558750391; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm4-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm4-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com. [98.139.213.129]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id b8si6618461vdu.2.2011.10.25.09.05.50; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.213.129 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.213.129; Received: from [98.139.215.142] by nm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Oct 2011 16:05:50 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.226] by tm13.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Oct 2011 16:05:50 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1035.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Oct 2011 16:05:50 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 97236.27468.bm@omp1035.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 46561 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2011 16:05:49 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: lxSg66QVM1m2wfiRzjUYBnnSEpyBM7u18ZUlJKEklUS5TBp fafZ2H9Orgzif38_ScwaF5yeiLlrhhjTdyLnCvCjOLSMNU.wIuRnkbxuJj2y vEnKkzlzCuwkbAhr8hHlODONt8VdAsDJH28Hyt17eTk8FsmwZ0zVsn89KPD1 XHvfnUwJ6nbVhjgvLjq0i4DA6zVufEs7MI4IabL2BCRFAAj4u.m3I651Dhac FXhlLXRaiRkfXkGglhmzKTSRr0xJWBp_uA_MGM4.gPRJtc_Q1wjGu9Rzeora qh554o1hEnwp3VePvKxekFS9OFLIiacDNmLVJweFBHFc9BB.jNRMrHf14Vzi qnFZ_CoTvNXMChj7IrKx3A4F_Z_nNhI9UcYpWPJlfdjmlrEQZ9L7RKVtanMw EZtfFk9NEI0gh4e9OGlMF_m2YkatlY7tHG6N6uAUo3hDUXLJiIIng0j064S6 HgPy2gcKr5hYxJV5S4JGU_kStqgYzePaw5rER5.R6oN_BflC71w-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- Received: from [192.168.1.68] (kali9putra@99.92.108.41 with xymcookie) by smtp110-mob.biz.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Oct 2011 09:05:49 -0700 PDT References: <20111022030801.GG28229@gonzales> <1319308068.11247.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111023203658.GH28229@gonzales> <1319404501.57946.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111023213304.GA3230@gonzales> <20111024151402.GA3062@gonzales> <4EA5ACD4.4030106@gmail.com> <20111024184651.GC3062@gonzales> <4EA5F890.6070501@gmail.com> <20111025002558.GA27114@gonzales> <4EA60BBC.1040707@gmail.com> <34E48F58-22FA-4546-A448-51BB53D7DC69@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: AAlojbanery Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8G4) Message-Id: <4CEE12E8-C43C-468B-BF6A-B896491FEF65@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8G4) From: "John E. Clifford" X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 1_10729571_AHXHjkQAABmHTqbJPguhJ0SvLjE Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:19:49 -0400 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.213.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--197508128 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --Apple-Mail-1--197508128 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well, it would depend on the facts on the ground and what I wanted to say a= bout it/them. I suspect that, like plural reference and L-sets, there fairly simple inter= translations between our two stories. This is clear in the case of general= izations (as they are generally called), but the situation with nonce group= s/ kinds is less clear: is there a permanent kind for every possible subjec= t, some manifestations of which engage in a single, or are new kinds create= d to fit each situation, with all of their manifestations involved? Socrat= es was warned not to reject the notion that shit had a form, so is flying a= lbatrosses with two haddocks in their throats a kind, and, if so, a permane= nt one or a nonce? Sent from my iPad On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:35, And Rosta wrote: > Quite. This is the sort of thing we should be free to disagree on. >=20 > What about the situation where every day there is exactly one lion in my = garden? Would you allow descriptions like "my daily lion" or "the lion in m= y garden" - singular lion? >=20 >> On 25 Oct 2011 13:50, "John E. Clifford" wrote: >>=20 >> If you can only count up to one lion, I am not going lion hunting with y= ou. The chances of being seriously outnumbered (in some, to you perverse, = way) are too great. I say that, if there is a lion on the left and one on = the right, there are two lions, not one, and it's going to take at least tw= o bullets to get rid of them. >>=20 >> Sent from my iPad >>=20 >> On Oct 24, 2011, at 21:07, And Rosta wrote: >>=20 >> > Martin Bays, On 25/10/2011 01:... >>=20 >> > --=20 >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups "lojban" group. >> > ... >>=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --Apple-Mail-1--197508128 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Well, it would depend on the facts on = the ground and what I wanted to say about it/them.
I suspect that= , like plural reference and L-sets, there fairly simple inter translations = between our two stories. This is clear in the case of generalizations (as t= hey are generally called), but the situation with nonce groups/ kinds is le= ss clear: is there a permanent kind for every possible subject, some manife= stations of which engage in a single, or are new kinds created to fit each = situation, with all of their manifestations involved?  Socrates was wa= rned not to reject the notion that shit had a form, so is flying albatrosse= s with two haddocks in their throats a kind, and, if so, a permanent one or= a nonce?

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 25, 2011, at= 10:35, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmai= l.com> wrote:

Quite. This is the sort of thing we should be free to disagree on.

What about the situation where every day there is exactly one lion in my= garden? Would you allow descriptions like "my daily lion" or "the lion in = my garden" - singular lion?

On 25 Oct 2011 13:50, "John E. Clifford" &= lt;kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:

If you can only coun= t up to one lion, I am not going lion hunting with you.  The chances o= f being seriously outnumbered (in some, to you perverse, way) are too great= .  I say that, if there is a lion on the left and one on the right, th= ere are two lions, not one, and it's going to take at least two bullets to = get rid of them.

Sent from my iPad


On Oct 24, 2011, at 21:07, And Rosta <= and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:

> Martin Bays, On 25/10/20= 11 01:...

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups "lojban" group.
> ...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--Apple-Mail-1--197508128--