Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:50075) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ8SC-0003Fg-ML; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:44:01 -0700 Received: by faap16 with SMTP id p16sf2250337faa.16 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=DpvCofit8bhyU7pr3DNpSq6QSCyQGs5qou9AYN6PYEc=; b=ZaklcCLfMtAAG882ZN0vUCNpXENDSUuE5Dum74kDyR3oF6NTDeMC5jttFwom6C1/Cp 9OxyoFVnNda3BZfM/WYMp3xHEPenTXa2AB89+EocWfu8kmPtJf07Brl1detRArgcSWeg YlDzCkQczT0xa1tN31XVbZFR50CNHQMLOAPEI= Received: by 10.223.13.217 with SMTP id d25mr109460faa.7.1319654625717; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.205.80.78 with SMTP id zt14ls850559bkb.1.gmail; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.148.84 with SMTP id o20mr4618354bkv.6.1319654623486; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.148.84 with SMTP id o20mr4618352bkv.6.1319654623456; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f50.google.com (mail-bw0-f50.google.com [209.85.214.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10si442177bkq.2.2011.10.26.11.43.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.50; Received: by mail-bw0-f50.google.com with SMTP id zt12so1010010bkb.9 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.147.5 with SMTP id j5mr16470400bkv.46.1319654623177; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.35.199 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111025044238.GD3062@gonzales> References: <20111021190055.GF28229@gonzales> <4E25E755-2FF6-4BDB-A5A4-5252845E0992@yahoo.com> <20111022030801.GG28229@gonzales> <1319308068.11247.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111023203658.GH28229@gonzales> <1319404501.57946.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111023213304.GA3230@gonzales> <20111024151402.GA3062@gonzales> <20111025044238.GD3062@gonzales> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:43:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bde040a6bad04b03809b0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --0015174bde040a6bad04b03809b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Martin Bays wrote: > * Monday, 2011-10-24 at 19:05 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas >: > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > > > > > > The issue was simply whether, in {lo vofli cipnralbatrossa cu xajmi}, > we > > > have > > > (a) a bunch of things, which is at some time a bunch of flying > > > albatrosses > > > or (b) a bunch of things each of which are at some time flying > > > albatrosses. > > > > I thought you also mentioned (c) a bunch of things such that at some > > time for all of them, each of them is a flying albatross. > > I'm assuming that "is a flying albatross" is distributive, so (c) is the > same as (a). > > > But if you are going to introduce time in a sentence that doesn't > > necessarily bring it up, shouldn't you also consider space? > > Quite probably so, yes; I was using 'time' as simplifying shorthand for > 'world'. It would indeed be nice if we could consider space to be just > another co-ordinate involved in specifying a world. > > But actually, there's a problem, even if we consider only time. Assuming > flying albatrosses remain albatrosses when they're not flying, in {lo > vofli cipnrxalbatrosi cu broda} (thanks for the fu'ivla correction, > btw), if the lo term gets as referents the bunch of all things which > have ever been flying albatrosses, that's just the bunch of all things > which have ever been albatrosses. > So this question is really one of whether "lo vofli cipnrxalbatrosi" defaults in meaning to "lo cipnrxalbatrosi poi ca'a vofli" or "lo cipnrxalbatrosi poi pu'i/ka'e vofli"? I think that's pretty much left up to context and either could be correct (for all we know, it could even refer to an albatross that's on Qantas). > So unless we introduce stages, which causes the same kinds of problems > that introducing kinds does, this "maximal bunch" approach to kinds > seems doomed. > > Curses. > > OK, so I'm back to {lo ka vofli cipnrxalbatrosi cu xajmi}. > > Martin > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --0015174bde040a6bad04b03809b0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org><= /span> wrote:
* Monday, 2011-10-24 at 19:05 -0= 300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambi= as@gmail.com>:

> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Martin Bays &l= t;mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> >= ;
> > The issue was simply whether, in {lo vofli cipnralbatrossa c= u xajmi}, we
> > have
> > (a) a bunch of things, which is at some time a = bunch of flying
> > albatrosses
> > or (b) a bunch of thi= ngs each of which are at some time flying
> > albatrosses.
>
> I thought you also mentioned (c) a bunch of things such that a= t some
> time for all of them, each of them is a flying albatross.
I'm assuming that "is a flying albatross" is distr= ibutive, so (c) is the
same as (a).

> But if you are going to introduce time in a sent= ence that doesn't
> necessarily bring it up, shouldn't you al= so consider space?

Quite probably so, yes; I was using 'ti= me' as simplifying shorthand for
'world'. It would indeed be nice if we could consider space to be j= ust
another co-ordinate involved in specifying a world.

But actua= lly, there's a problem, even if we consider only time. Assuming
flying albatrosses remain albatrosses when they're not flying, in {lovofli cipnrxalbatrosi cu broda} (thanks for the fu'ivla correction,btw), if the lo term gets as referents the bunch of all things which
have ever been flying albatrosses, that's just the bunch of all things<= br>which have ever been albatrosses.
=A0
=A0=A0So this question is really one of whether "lo vofli cipnrxa= lbatrosi" defaults in meaning to "lo=A0cipnrxalbatrosi poi ca'= ;a vofli"=A0=A0or "lo=A0cipnrxalbatrosi poi=A0pu'i/ka'e v= ofli"?=A0 I think that's pretty much left up to context and either= could be correct (for all we know, it could even refer to an albatross tha= t's on Qantas).
=A0
So unless we introduce stages, w= hich causes the same kinds of problems
that introducing kinds does, this= "maximal bunch" approach to kinds
seems doomed.

Curses.

OK, so I'm back to {lo ka vofli cip= nrxalbatrosi cu xajmi}.

Martin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015174bde040a6bad04b03809b0--