Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:36968) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RKb1N-0002cV-D9; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:26:25 -0700 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20sf1074724wye.16 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:26:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WqjUpryIP7RqG9NjihZ8MYg3T7zO2pkvXBzAkrikJr8=; b=XDpnl7nPyX0ZJJH7bRLa9DUHHG/51Sd/LrBcIsEhp1HLCd1ILrifGJieqZPO/wpLkd R6Mqrv5v4z9w3YiSi2AE/e1HVZej3Qv1YLmiUWjKpiwLK4/7xhAFZJRHvIjWo91DeQjm e1uwXaQHJI5sECi0X2+LSug4lVpnDPGS05jyc= Received: by 10.216.131.155 with SMTP id m27mr248190wei.73.1320002752162; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:25:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.97.30 with SMTP id j30ls10604095wbn.4.gmail; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.206.133 with SMTP id fu5mr520778wbb.3.1320002751026; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.206.133 with SMTP id fu5mr520777wbb.3.1320002751001; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (mail-wy0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k17si8409269wbo.1.2011.10.30.12.25.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.175; Received: by wyh5 with SMTP id 5so626898wyh.20 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.221.228 with SMTP id r78mr2096358wep.31.1320002750892; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.81] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eu16sm28249987wbb.7.2011.10.30.12.25.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EADA4BC.5030406@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:25:48 +0000 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable References: <4EA5F890.6070501@gmail.com> <20111025002558.GA27114@gonzales> <4EA60BBC.1040707@gmail.com> <20111025021504.GB27114@gonzales> <4EA68224.1080406@gmail.com> <20111026033114.GB3119@gonzales> <4EA7BF06.5050103@gmail.com> <4EAA8AC9.2010000@gmail.com> <20111029001437.GA5535@gonzales> <20111029145956.GB9385@gonzales> <9AB5D37A-29BD-45FA-9A92-B6D0DA85956D@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <9AB5D37A-29BD-45FA-9A92-B6D0DA85956D@yahoo.com> X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / John E. Clifford, On 30/10/2011 18:38: > Whatever else it does ( and I confess to not following most of the > subsequent discussion), xorxes' story raises one of the great > problems for the Aristotelian wing: how do we get to generalizations > from limited instances? Children who have seen only chihuahuas, > somehow recognize terriers and spaniels as dogs, for example. Xorxes > suggests the Platonic answer: we are directly aware of the kind when > we see the instance (well, some of us, anyhow). Is that Xorxes's answer? I'd have thought his answer is rather that people = strive to form inductive generalizations, as in fact is abundantly attested= by child language, e.g. the child that calls the moon 'ball', or (as my so= n did) an overhead lamp 'moon'. > I don't think that is a very good answer, but the attempts to find > psychological mechanism to explain how we do it so well are not much > better. But I still don't see why kinds (etc.) are needed for Lojban > semantics or just explaining what Lojban expressions do nor why, if > they are needed, maximal bunches of the appropriate sort won't do the > trick -- at a significant ontological savings. Is anybody actually saying kinds are needed? It seems to me that Xorxes is = saying we need just one sort of thing, call them Foobles, and Martin is say= ing that Foobles should be subdivided into Snargles and Kinds, and that Kin= ds are unnecessary. Thus Xorxes is not so much advocating Kinds as not acce= pting Martin's Snargle--Kind distinction. --And. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.