Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:46376) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RKrjB-0006Wo-Bd; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:16:44 -0700 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4sf9435484pzk.16 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:16:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key :x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=nlVy+wZWP7rF4xLOECbGnCu5Fj5+zO4KaGXGiPxRIr0=; b=amaAB57Ctn6TRfiPoUYpC0rCqRVaq6rrYQBxeqZcp/Vl+QiSzYJf+1yex2CPbm/LLJ TREomFrqF0YBubimTU0BuyyiJQQPIqIemWZKzBV+ItIM55ossaQS95Tq+JbBbTf4anZx 6rAXgThQMvBQmlAbjMs9nBAMUCJxoFT8crMU0= Received: by 10.68.25.232 with SMTP id f8mr1346307pbg.2.1320066988882; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:16:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.42.97 with SMTP id n1ls13683834pbl.2.gmail; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.30.34 with SMTP id p2mr12531629pbh.4.1320066988411; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.30.34 with SMTP id p2mr12531627pbh.4.1320066988401; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r5si651935pbe.1.2011.10.31.06.16.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19; Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9VDGR5Z019428 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:16:27 GMT Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1RKrWl-0000Ub-PS for lojban@googlegroups.com; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:03:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:03:47 -0400 From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable Message-ID: <20111031130347.GB10412@gonzales> References: <20111029221510.GA32586@gonzales> <20111030044700.GB32586@gonzales> <20111030151405.GC32586@gonzales> <20111030182343.GA3142@gonzales> <20111030212542.GA9317@gonzales> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: sipna User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Sunday, 2011-10-30 at 19:00 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > > That does raise (again) the possibly important question of where it is > > that a bunch of lions cinfos. > > > > Obvious answers: > > (i) everywhere at least one of them zvatis; > > (ii) at some specificish locale, such as their centre of mass; > > (iii) everywhere. > > > > (ii) is icky. >=20 > It could also be the minimum volume that contains them all, Isn't that the same as (i)? > unless you require the answer to "where" to be in point form. Given {bu'u}, it seems that we're forced in theory to have the answer be some subset of space. Of course I wouldn't expect us to define the set thoroughly. > > Under (iii), {lo vi cinfo} wouldn't work. > > > > So I guess you're working with (i)? >=20 > Where would you say you remna? Is there a single right answer? Unless we're working with (iii), my answer would be: where I am. If you asked me {xu do bu'u ti remna}, I'd probably say {go'i} if you were pointing at my spleen, but {na go'i} if you were pointing at one of my hairs, but would leave it to philosophers to debate whether I'm right or not. Anyway, whatever the precise answer, if we work with anything like (i) or (iii) it seems that actually {lo vi cinfo} only works if the tautology is {ro lo vi cinfo cu vi cinfo} and not just {lo vi cinfo cu vi cinfo} , because the second holds even if all but one of the lions is off in africa (or, assuming possible worlds are handled analogously, are space-lions from Quuxkl). (this is relevant to JC's bunch-kinds idea, by the way, so isn't as much of a tangent as it may appear!) Martin --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6unLMACgkQULC7OLX7LNbLwQCg6NpY1HhmPrVEgYsjM84WkykL HU4AoMKaedpqiDSjgKSV59c8JYb7iUFe =MCIY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--