Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:48609) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RKwFk-0003TU-Bb; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:06:35 -0700 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16sf422017vws.16 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:06:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-yahoo-newman-property :x-ymail-osg:x-yahoo-smtp:references:in-reply-to :x-apple-yahoo-original-message-folder:mime-version:message-id :x-mailer:from:x-apple-yahoo-replied-msgid:subject:date:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QpyIU2Z4oadXXg92tetTnz0sxiR+53qqTEzA/KYWp9Y=; b=BskgkCUKG+/7qcegOrODHMDudCkgkg+X0UchSuBq/Y6dgYfrgW06FmRn+6t+KFPyII jFG9slZpXMLyavUJSfOR5nSTohIfbU+xb750wVPufPcxWNU7kr2LW93IkOlePl/ixZLu RAUwgx0U+szc6V/k9zxy1T0+kOYPo1DpoNz0o= Received: by 10.52.115.195 with SMTP id jq3mr521773vdb.17.1320084383475; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:06:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.221.13.132 with SMTP id pm4ls2967667vcb.5.canary; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.88.164 with SMTP id bh4mr1848480vdb.8.1320084382961; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.88.164 with SMTP id bh4mr1848479vdb.8.1320084382953; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm15-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm15-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com. [98.139.52.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id cn4si4132170vdb.3.2011.10.31.11.06.22; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.52.236; Received: from [98.139.52.194] by nm15.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2011 18:06:22 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.186] by tm7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2011 18:06:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1069.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2011 18:06:22 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 804054.68519.bm@omp1069.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 15864 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2011 18:06:22 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 0GYJ62oVM1mrxzgkocHtbzk_X.6G8wFJ2EgOHxeN9tvVYV7 d1Mpa_i_RU29ojPY8tJxZBaEe5ZUTT2DNLHNVSzpbqraiWVAq_xqjZl7Aa9n 2qWCIQcXBGDnrjYoC0SM82KpWZVVx5_Hqkv0vJwxdAeqpNhtPW3cA6O8TPkr 5c6dOzV1azXLF3ACNDRzm6vOsGBCmdQ8vdu0B2aqWJCjO.qXyC8oJAwWN.c9 jjJ0cr7JWcma.VLauF8.cB02t00eYqi45G_w8UyRouLDZKylplQiDg1vJDxn msM0F3oPy.A5245ZKXr6xgvSr1tDzFByc3mOGYL62MgU4_9n90GxF8KyWiE6 G6zzddjSybS2WHBePjM5JbXDVzlq8t3yJ3gqNuFH82UOirqNMBJVd4IBAAHA GjVpQtbULS5A2v7hvmML_VSn724MguOQ1NjIBnoxxpw47yZ0g_A3XeMCdZOp mhB6l9WQwbfgD.aN3Baf6Ubizj_l9vKW08oXLBfGi3KoDwAR7DxH2ed0GIk8 6mK.qyA9i X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- Received: from [192.168.1.68] (kali9putra@99.92.108.41 with xymcookie) by smtp107-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2011 11:06:22 -0700 PDT References: <20111029221510.GA32586@gonzales> <20111030044700.GB32586@gonzales> <20111030151405.GC32586@gonzales> <20111030182343.GA3142@gonzales> <20111030212542.GA9317@gonzales> <20111031130347.GB10412@gonzales> In-Reply-To: X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: AAlojbanery Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8G4) Message-Id: <0290FC97-5C5F-45A3-BC4E-295251DE22A4@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8G4) From: "John E. Clifford" X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 1_10874473_AHjHjkQAAUwATq6m2whfuFEIFog Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:20:48 -0400 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / OK, So you've got philosophers pegged. But from a more linguistic or Lojba= nic pov, a each lion cinfos where it zvatis, and so bunch of lions cinfos m= anywhere, since the bunch cinfos only conjunctively. =20 Sent from my iPad On Oct 31, 2011, at 9:46, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Martin Bays wrote: >> * Sunday, 2011-10-30 at 19:00 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : >>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Martin Bays wrote: >>>> That does raise (again) the possibly important question of where it is >>>> that a bunch of lions cinfos. >>>>=20 >>>> Obvious answers: >>>> (i) everywhere at least one of them zvatis; >>>> (ii) at some specificish locale, such as their centre of mass; >>>> (iii) everywhere. >>>>=20 >>>> (ii) is icky. >>>=20 >>> It could also be the minimum volume that contains them all, >>=20 >> Isn't that the same as (i)? >=20 > I took (i) to mean they were manywhere (there and there and there and > there and ...), while (ii) meant they were just onewhere (only there). > I was suggesting that (ii) could possibly be one big volume-like there > rather than a small point-like there. >=20 >=20 >>> Where would you say you remna? Is there a single right answer? >>=20 >> Unless we're working with (iii), my answer would be: where I am. If you >> asked me {xu do bu'u ti remna}, I'd probably say {go'i} if you were >> pointing at my spleen, but {na go'i} if you were pointing at one of my >> hairs, but would leave it to philosophers to debate whether I'm right or >> not. >=20 > If I were pointing at your spleen, I should probably say "bu'u ta". If > I were pointing at the room we were both in, I could say "bu'u ti". I > think it would generally make more sense to me to say "do zvati lo vi > kumfa" than "do zvati lo betfu be do". >=20 > But I agree it is a matter better left to philosophers, which is to > say that there is no single right answer. Same thing would happen if I > asked you when you remna. Did you remna yesterday and remna again > today, or is there just one long when that you remna in? >=20 >> Anyway, whatever the precise answer, if we work with anything like (i) >> or (iii) it seems that actually {lo vi cinfo} only works if the >> tautology is >> {ro lo vi cinfo cu vi cinfo} >> and not just >> {lo vi cinfo cu vi cinfo} , >> because the second holds even if all but one of the lions is off >> in africa (or, assuming possible worlds are handled analogously, are >> space-lions from Quuxkl). >=20 > I obviously would say that the tautology is "lo vi cinfo cu vi cinfo", > which of course does not exclude the (non-tautological) possibility > that "lo vi cinfo cu vu ji'a cinfo". >=20 > mu'o mi'e xorxes >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an?hl=3Den. >=20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.