Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:59906)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCOib25n_BhD4wbz1BBoEvPkVig@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RL0L3-0006JL-E5; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:24 -0700
Received: by qan41 with SMTP id 41sf4189438qan.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=2yeWKA7FpP8mRbhbA2HkjodC5G6N4HpmKrWzaxZzlS0=;
        b=yAKE/23YBBNe5aYciUQyRJkmpCXMAFUBNQ8dDERzS359lu1FeFl3KHkPpr3CAkrSQW
         vdh6UsWIu+oq81xHnW4pfsjadm2muk1zotXBBtE9QgH6pztuRsUD6N3zhGoGLYWwQ2WX
         5BTDQjmUwnWkuRLULDaSovElcO/Mug/HzyvcQ=
Received: by 10.224.52.81 with SMTP id h17mr3924523qag.0.1320100088531;
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.209.134 with SMTP id gg6ls14480043qab.2.gmail; Mon, 31 Oct
 2011 15:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.111.129 with SMTP id s1mr3909159qap.3.1320100087339;
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.111.129 with SMTP id s1mr3909158qap.3.1320100087328;
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f50.google.com (mail-qw0-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j29si14056692qcs.2.2011.10.31.15.28.07
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.50;
Received: by qan41 with SMTP id 41so13467qan.9
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.31.78 with SMTP id y14mr2170241obh.25.1320100087130; Mon,
 31 Oct 2011 15:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.182.37.70 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1320099512.2870.1.camel@fagricipni-desktop>
References: <1320099512.2870.1.camel@fagricipni-desktop>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:28:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CALm==BV4Qy_XsXtg8Tu5yraN=ciFU+MEwY5n_Re9V79ge1JGVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Dot-side and non-cmevla?
From: ".arpis." <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.50 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93b576ec2e9f404b09fc044
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--14dae93b576ec2e9f404b09fc044
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

How is {la ka trina} distinguishable from {la .kaTRIna.}?

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:18 PM, H. Felton <lojban707@fagricipni.com> wrote:

> Regarding the dot-side issue: was a consensus ever reached on
> the pro-dot-side whether cmene that contained the sequence
> "la" not preceded by a consonant, but which were not cmevla
> needed dot-side "protection"?; eg, "la labno"; "la xrula"; or
> if "la ka trina" is valid, then a name containing "la'u" should
> also be valid; finally, tanru, lujvo, and fu'ivla can also
> contain the sequence "la" not preceded by a consonant.
> I wouldn't think that these names would need dot-side
> protection; only those which are cmevla.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
mu'o mi'e .arpis.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--14dae93b576ec2e9f404b09fc044
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

How is {la ka trina} distinguishable from {la .kaTRIna.}?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:18 PM, H. Felton <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:lojban707@fagricipni.com">lojban707@fagricipni.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Regarding the dot-side issue: was a consensus ever reached on<br>
the pro-dot-side whether cmene that contained the sequence<br>
&quot;la&quot; not preceded by a consonant, but which were not cmevla<br>
needed dot-side &quot;protection&quot;?; eg, &quot;la labno&quot;; &quot;la xrula&quot;; or<br>
if &quot;la ka trina&quot; is valid, then a name containing &quot;la&#39;u&quot; should<br>
also be valid; finally, tanru, lujvo, and fu&#39;ivla can also<br>
contain the sequence &quot;la&quot; not preceded by a consonant.<br>
I wouldn&#39;t think that these names would need dot-side<br>
protection; only those which are cmevla.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quot;lojban&quot; group.<br>
To post to this group, send email to <a href="mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to <a href="mailto:lojban%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
For more options, visit this group at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en" target="_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en</a>.<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e .arpis.<br><br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.<br />



--14dae93b576ec2e9f404b09fc044--