Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:55339)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCLi-v_X3FRDAxrz1BBoEZ9Dq5A@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RL0UT-0006MU-K1; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:38:08 -0700
Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14sf2872271vcb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to
         :mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=SBpNtXbl+O0NLhWgaiWOa6FyczLcyCWEV7rqjxWRGyI=;
        b=yCHWSbJJuUlBJwK5O9lg5t7D5sgLLBDnehnBScspLed/mcdbPszhHC6XvMjSYPDtL+
         9/LnLaJyF0u3o6e3arKkk1inl9++sstQ+J8os9uh29u9a3aWLIP/COqXsghRfGdgLyLK
         u7bxE61dU7XhXdlRJdeq+eZyKdGy1P+lq47Xc=
Received: by 10.52.29.232 with SMTP id n8mr799184vdh.0.1320100672301;
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.108.71 with SMTP id e7ls3172773vcp.3.canary; Mon, 31 Oct
 2011 15:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.30.195 with SMTP id u3mr2247480vdh.3.1320100671688;
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.30.195 with SMTP id u3mr2247479vdh.3.1320100671679;
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8si4514794vdu.2.2011.10.31.15.37.51
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of minimiscience@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.182;
Received: by vcbfk26 with SMTP id fk26so2112151vcb.13
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.240.145 with SMTP id wa17mr5874175vdc.118.1320100671351;
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acd41299990.rit.edu (acd41299990.rit.edu. [129.21.40.123])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i18sm11873802vdu.14.2011.10.31.15.37.50
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <C6B866DA-DA47-49A2-9083-E85E41776B83@gmail.com>
From: Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <1320099512.2870.1.camel@fagricipni-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: [lojban] Dot-side and non-cmevla?
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:37:48 -0400
References: <1320099512.2870.1.camel@fagricipni-desktop>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-Original-Sender: minimiscience@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of minimiscience@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=minimiscience@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On 31 Oct 2011, at 18:18, H. Felton wrote:
> Regarding the dot-side issue: was a consensus ever reached on
> the pro-dot-side whether cmene that contained the sequence
> "la" not preceded by a consonant, but which were not cmevla
> needed dot-side "protection"?; eg, "la labno"; "la xrula"; or
> if "la ka trina" is valid, then a name containing "la'u" should
> also be valid; finally, tanru, lujvo, and fu'ivla can also
> contain the sequence "la" not preceded by a consonant.
> I wouldn't think that these names would need dot-side
> protection; only those which are cmevla.

Pre-dot side, non-{cmevla} containing "la" were treated exactly the  
same as other non-{cmevla}, and the dot side doesn't change that.  The  
only changes the dot side makes are (1) {cmevla} may freely contain  
"la", "lai", "la'i", and "doi" (as long as they still end in a  
consonant and obey all the other rules of Lojban morphology), and (2)  
each {cmevla} must be preceded by a pause (and, as before, followed by  
one), but as periods and spaces are functionally nigh-identical in  
written text, they are often not represented.  As before, you have the  
option of inserting a pause/period between any two words (but never in  
the middle of a word!); pauses are only mandatory before & after  
{cmevla}, before words beginning in a vowel, after words ending in "y"  
under certain circumstances, and in ZOI quotes.

mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.