Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:61489) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RLGBY-0003Sj-J7; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:39 -0700 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf2862826bka.16 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=xXLKzMOIapGcyQMPj+Qj/PTk0vApfB2tL9vphWF+BBo=; b=sgLV1VTgZHiiAFmYjSDHS1kvDrFiPFdA0nfg96VaU8HxO/mq3pjOiAr+FR2XhAwLKa HGKRwy0uuTfpX07uIoq7Wernm/uUMFS093MZoui0bccmeXgcYtKw+PFe92pbLvv3ZxXP +5HS3ZcdctJILVWnDNJGGzsfBDQkGYc+Skm7A= Received: by 10.204.140.10 with SMTP id g10mr1034bku.12.1320161002239; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.102.78 with SMTP id f14ls1742221bko.3.gmail; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.140.144 with SMTP id i16mr6845bku.0.1320161001223; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.140.144 with SMTP id i16mr6844bku.0.1320161001205; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com (mail-bw0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v13si3471512bkf.0.2011.11.01.08.23.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.47; Received: by bkbzv3 with SMTP id zv3so3608573bkb.20 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.91.73 with SMTP id l9mr1316794fam.22.1320161000965; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.5.165 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:23:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111101051643.GA5911@gonzales> References: <20111030151405.GC32586@gonzales> <20111030182343.GA3142@gonzales> <20111030212542.GA9317@gonzales> <20111031130347.GB10412@gonzales> <20111031200944.GA6357@gonzales> <20111101051643.GA5911@gonzales> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:23:20 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Martin Bays wrote: > > So rather than model merely telling us whether, given a proposition > P and a point w in the space of worlds, P holds at w, it instead tells > us whether, given a proposition P and a *subset* W of the space of > worlds, P holds at/in/on W. That's one way of thinking about tense. Another way is not to extract the time/space information out of the proposition at all, make it an integral part of the proposition, so that the tensed sentence "mi pu klama" is (roughly) equivalemt to the untensed sentence "lo nu mi klama cu purci", just like the tagged sentence "mi bai klama" is (roughly) equivalent to the untagged sentence "lo nu mi klama cu se bapli". In this view, space and time are just additional aspects of the world, not indices on worlds. > Suppose ko'a is assigned to a bunch of three lions, one of which is in > my garden, one of which is in my living room, and the third of which is > in Nairobi (I don't live in Nairobi). > > With this new setup, it's now consistent to have: > > xu ko'a vi le mi purdi cu cinfo .i na go'i > xu ko'a ne'i le mi surla kumfa cu cinfo .i na go'i > xu ko'a ne'i la nairobis cinfo .i na go'i > xu ko'a ga'u la terdi cu cinfo .i go'i > > So the upshot is that there's no need to make {ro lo broda cu broda} be > a tautology to have {lo vi cinfo} get only nearby lions; it wouldn't get > ko'a in the above example. If you don't want to go through many worlds, you can just ask whether these are true: xu lo nu ko'a cinfo cu zvati lo mi purdi xu lo nu ko'a cinfo cu nenri lo mi surla kumfa xu lo nu ko'a cinfo cu nenri la nairobis xu lo nu ko'a cinfo cu gapru la terdi That only involves understanding "zvati", "nenri" and "gapru", we don't need to concern ourselves with worlds or sets of worlds. So instead of asking where a certain proposition is true, you ask where a certain event takes place. I would tend to agree with your answers to the ne'i questions. The last one makes me think of winged lions, or maybe lions in a space station, since presumably the Earth's atmosphere is part of the Earth. I'm not sure about the first one. (I will take it by "vi" you meant "bu'u"="fi'o se zvati", since for me "vi"="fi'o cmalu tersei".) I think for "ko'a zvati ko'e" to be true, it is not necessary that ko'a be completely contained inside of ko'e, as with nenri. If you ask "xu ko'a cinfo bu'u lo mi purdi" I would prefer to answer "pa ko'a go'i" or "su'o ko'a go'i" or "me'i ko'a go'i" instead of either plain "go'i" or "na go'i" because whichever of those is true, with such an odd bundle of referents for "ko'a", it is unhelpful. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.