Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:55881) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RLGvX-0004Xj-3M; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:11:07 -0700 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf2907761bka.16 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:10:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4009nKvDANE4eXP43rnCKfHWvdqg7SX1X/V06cCCq54=; b=2Hf2Wzy4KMlHD9pT74AxCiz3FBZob7nQM58mWKFS7DwLLkNQUjd5hGGuFb5nu1sU4A NVlfF54t/4YqHxkBNjpUS4dk613zs2KAr1zUhQfK7kbyvrWXw28gBBEtua0VBCkNGzQW R12PIPEqvgCQvoQTAvy9V9SnBSAR3XC4He26U= Received: by 10.204.129.26 with SMTP id m26mr48629bks.1.1320163852521; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:10:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.33.136 with SMTP id h8ls4890509bkd.0.gmail; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.132.193 with SMTP id c1mr26284bkt.4.1320163849928; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.132.193 with SMTP id c1mr26282bkt.4.1320163849898; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f43.google.com (mail-fx0-f43.google.com [209.85.161.43]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i17si8465847fai.0.2011.11.01.09.10.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.43; Received: by mail-fx0-f43.google.com with SMTP id t9so9296319faa.2 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:10:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.5.82 with SMTP id 18mr1543476fau.27.1320163849721; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.5.165 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:10:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4EA5ACD4.4030106@gmail.com> <20111024184651.GC3062@gonzales> <4EA5F890.6070501@gmail.com> <20111025002558.GA27114@gonzales> <4EA60BBC.1040707@gmail.com> <20111025021504.GB27114@gonzales> <4EA68224.1080406@gmail.com> <20111026033114.GB3119@gonzales> <4EA7BF06.5050103@gmail.com> <4EAA8AC9.2010000@gmail.com> <20111029001437.GA5535@gonzales> <1319900200.95220.YahooMailRC@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:10:49 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > =A0 This brings up a question that I've always wondered about lojban, alt= hough > this is possibly tangential to this main thread, so I apologize. This thread has already tangented off in all sorts of different directions, so there's no need to apologize. > I've > always been worried about the glosses of so'a, so'e.=A0 If I want to say = I > want to say, aboriginal-like, that =A0I have a vague but large amount of > spears, how do I do it? "mi ponse=A0so'i kilga'axa'i" But if I want to sp= ecify > an even larger, although still vague, amount, I can't go to so'e and so'a > because they imply (at least in their English glosses)=A0that they are on= ly a > relationship to some defined amount (the totality of spears in our univer= se > of discourse). Yes, "so'i sai" and "so'i cai" are better for that. > How is it that the scale seems to shift from quantities > (few, some, many) to percentages=A0(most, almost all)?=A0 Is this just a = problem > with the English gloss? =A0Can they mean either, depending on whther they= are > inside or outside the gadri? I think "so'e" and "so'a" must always be less than "ro", while "so'i", "so'o" and "so'u" are compatible with "ro". If the intention was that "so'e" and "so'a" also be compatible with "ro" then the choice of keywords was very unfortunate. There's no way that "almost all" and "all" can be the same number. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.