Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:55388) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RLbLw-0003f6-Po; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:59:46 -0700 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20sf261223wye.16 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:59:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tlsazTToc+GUsDQLbWmzRMwKFvgVexapJPjhy1SMLfg=; b=fKJJ3H5+7i9/b0BhZyj+0nd13tUAGMxsk/xNRaHHeb6V3lmZ85nornhHW5bgqC29KQ lk7Yx5PFVd9vtNlLtCc0Qja1pbiYYV7Kc5D+dOCByQuykpgGyRdyKGjgrZscqE9Go6+d GY/08yMQllhom1LJCFeDW0tyqELRtnssV2X0Q= Received: by 10.216.155.213 with SMTP id j63mr168530wek.29.1320242370164; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:59:30 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.213.102.141 with SMTP id g13ls133827ebo.0.gmail; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.10.19 with SMTP id n19mr782662ebn.3.1320242369037; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.10.19 with SMTP id n19mr782661ebn.3.1320242369014; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com (mail-fx0-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t21si4662490faf.0.2011.11.02.06.59.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.52; Received: by mail-fx0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n26so435851faa.25 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:59:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.92.135 with SMTP id r7mr8923004fam.35.1320242368881; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.10.38 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:59:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111102002550.GA18355@gonzales> References: <20111030182343.GA3142@gonzales> <20111030212542.GA9317@gonzales> <20111031130347.GB10412@gonzales> <20111031200944.GA6357@gonzales> <20111101051643.GA5911@gonzales> <20111102002550.GA18355@gonzales> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:59:28 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > > I think you've explained before how you derive a wholly defined version > of the "imaginary journey" model from this. Maybe I can understand it > better this time. [...] > Do I have you right? Yes, I think so. > Interaction with quantifier scope should be clear; e.g. > {ba ku ro do facki lo du'u mi vlipa} > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {lo nu ro do zgana lo du'u mi vlipa cu balvi} > =A0 =A0~~ "one day, you will all see my power!" > {ro do ba facki lo du'u mi vlipa} > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {ro da poi me do zo'u da ba facki lo du'u mi vlipa} > =A0 =A0=3D=3D {ro da poi me do zo'u lo nu da facki lo du'u mi vlipa cu ba= lvi} > =A0 =A0~~ "each of you will one day see my power!" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(possibly at different times) I think the example would work better with "pa roi ku" or "su'o roi ku" instead of (or in addition to) "ba ku". I don't think "lo nu ro do facki lo du'u mi vlipa" is necessarily "lo nu pa roi ro do facki lo du'u mi vlipa". >> > Suppose ko'a is assigned to a bunch of three lions, one of which is in >> > my garden, one of which is in my living room, and the third of which i= s >> > in Nairobi (I don't live in Nairobi). >> > >> > With this new setup, it's now consistent to have: >> > >> > xu ko'a vi le mi purdi cu cinfo .i na go'i > >> I'm not sure about the first one. (I will take it by "vi" you meant >> "bu'u"=3D"fi'o se zvati", since for me "vi"=3D"fi'o cmalu tersei". > > I was aiming more for "within a small distance of". Do we have anything > for that? You mean "in or around my garden"? I'd say "ne'i ja ne'a lo mi purdi". mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.