Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:59829) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RLdTh-0005As-28; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:15:53 -0700 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16sf289591vws.16 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:15:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SLm74Ij6t5sEekYhalw2f3E83ZjwCuYcu6beENNXMUE=; b=HlqtVtfJ8y3V52KSUeLip5Xa8h/C3oyZV2ryjpYQ4euj83OliVEEaF3nEPMxrqSg7i dHhUAEEJGwDL2aEmtMABYv11XTeKliT8J1cCwP6f60GUIxcFMfLho1y/eBdixhnlPNxi g4AJ8O4lk2hSvSwqRf5tQVsWZSzu9M+hipMOo= Received: by 10.52.95.34 with SMTP id dh2mr1236390vdb.10.1320250539608; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.24.163 with SMTP id v3ls1451838vdf.3.gmail; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.38.198 with SMTP id i6mr5461416vdk.2.1320250539009; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.38.198 with SMTP id i6mr5461414vdk.2.1320250538997; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pi.meson.org (pi.meson.org. [96.56.207.26]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id cn4si1554471vdb.3.2011.11.02.09.15.38; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 96.56.207.26 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of mark@kli.org) client-ip=96.56.207.26; Received: (qmail 9273 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2011 16:15:38 -0000 Received: from nagas.meson.org (192.168.1.101) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2011 16:15:38 -0000 Message-ID: <4EB16CAA.5090504@kli.org> Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:15:38 -0400 From: "Mark E. Shoulson" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Big baby words list References: <20111102071258.GA29201@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <201111020621.37040.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20111102102853.GJ15498@nvg.org> <201111020941.30684.phma@phma.optus.nu> <27720612.352.1320245004574.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqie15> In-Reply-To: <27720612.352.1320245004574.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqie15> X-Original-Sender: mark@kli.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 96.56.207.26 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of mark@kli.org) smtp.mail=mark@kli.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On 11/02/2011 10:43 AM, najrut wrote: > I'm strongly against manual adding new words. Why don't use some=20 > algorithm similar to used in scoreGismu ? > > chinese =E5=97=9D ge > hindi Hicak=C4=AB hicak > english hiccup xikap > spanish hipo xip > arabic =D9=81=D9=88=D8=A7=D9=82 [fwaq] fuak > russian =D0=B8=D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=82=D1=8C [ikats'] ika > > All this makes me like type-4 fu'ivla even less. Here I am, bobbing=20 along, reading my Lojban text. I come across an unfamiliar word. Gee,=20 whatever could this be? Oh, of course, it's a combination of the Spanish=20 and Russian. Or it's the native term for something. So all I need to do=20 to understand Lojban is to learn the (effectively a priori) gismu and=20 rafsi, and be able to recognize ALL THE OTHER LANGUAGES THERE ARE. These=20 fu'ivla are effectively a priori words like gismu, except that gismu are=20 fixed in number and have a fixed authoritative list. If everyone=20 randomly makes up words when they can't be bothered to think of a good=20 lujvo (which is not to say that all fu'ivla can be replaced by lujvo,=20 but (a) I think more of them can than is commonly claimed, and (b) even=20 given that I'm wrong about that, you can bet that there are no few=20 fu'ivla that are/will be invented that would be better as lujvo), then=20 we get a million non-mutually-intelligible dialects, not a language at=20 all. And even for fu'ivla that are legitimately fu'ivla, there will=20 still be arbitrarily many different forms depending on the biases and=20 knowledge of each coiner. I think at *least* you should give some sort of heads-up in the form of=20 prefixed rafsi (type-3 fu'ivla), maybe start to learn to transition from=20 type-3 to type-4 as it becomes more familiar (make dropping off that=20 rafsi for well-known words a "natural" part of colloquial and fluent=20 speech), and make type-4 fu'ivla only when they are (or will be) more or=20 less universally recognized. Or at the very least make sure there's a=20 Central Repository, an Academie Lojbanique, to approve these fu'ivla so=20 at least I have someplace to look them up. ~mark --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.