Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:51507) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RMTjw-00087s-Pz; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:04:12 -0700 Received: by iage36 with SMTP id e36sf4386301iag.16 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:03:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key :x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=bmHf3873iTHgMXbpdQEKFK1gZmX9CA5viH2D8OOVomI=; b=uA6h8y5tkdu6ZLhjQ6vEYxArJisMg30J529AyqtzsAchxowh8eNEE7loX2QfJzyW4M aArjusQpt4C4JdJg+lFMHK+KAzYmGOcDNYoVr4o2aMHZ6YPHa79KigT5mZSB3clgLsHh UqU9l00VyyOG3VkfcKxO6LqrXXYQ9TB3pAErw= Received: by 10.50.149.193 with SMTP id uc1mr1807676igb.17.1320451435939; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:03:55 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.65.66 with SMTP id h2ls7717744ibi.2.gmail; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.146.136 with SMTP id j8mr5980929icv.8.1320451435043; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.146.136 with SMTP id j8mr5980925icv.8.1320451435016; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5si6854777pbe.2.2011.11.04.17.03.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19; Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pA503s5k005990 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 00:03:54 GMT Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1RMTjm-0005xS-3Y for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:03:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:03:54 -0400 From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable Message-ID: <20111105000354.GC24058@gonzales> References: <20111026033114.GB3119@gonzales> <4EA7BF06.5050103@gmail.com> <4EAA8AC9.2010000@gmail.com> <20111029001437.GA5535@gonzales> <4EAC2461.4040307@gmail.com> <20111029172822.GC9385@gonzales> <4EAC5B24.4000604@gmail.com> <20111103234955.GA3758@gonzales> <4EB43035.6040407@gmail.com> <20111104233756.GB24058@gonzales> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111104233756.GB24058@gonzales> X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: xadni User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Friday, 2011-11-04 at 19:37 -0400 - Martin Bays : > So perhaps it would be helpful to think about it like this: >=20 > Given e.g. a binary predicate P(x,y), which let's say is to start with > defined only when x is a foo and y is quux, > (i) has us define what P(X,Y) means where X is a bunch of foos and Y is > a bunch of quuxs (here a bunch of foos corresponds to a set of foos); > meanwhile, (iii) (or something like it) has us define what P(x/~, y/~) > means, where x/~ is an imaginary foo - i.e. one of the new things we get > when we consider a new, coarser notion of equality of foos - and y/~ is > an imaginary quux. >=20 > So we need to consider the properties of these new beasties X and x/~. > One possible, arguably natural, scheme for this in the case of x/~ leads > to the quantifier-permuting ambiguities discussed at the top of this > post. One quick hopefully-clarificatory remark: the "default" semantics of bunches and imaginaries would be conjunctive and disjunctive respectively. i.e. given a predicate P(x,y), unless there were something special going on with P (like with bevri), we would expect that P(X,Y) holds iff P(x,y) does whenever x is in the bunch X and y is in the bunch Y (i.e. P is "distributive"), and P(x/E,y/F) will hold iff P(x',y') does for *some* x' and y' such that x'Ex and y'Fy, i.e. x'/E =3D x/E and y'/F =3D y/F, i.e. x' is equivalent to x and y' is equivalent to y where the notions of equivalence are specified by the imaginaries. So e.g. if Beret is the imaginary we get when we consider *all* berets to be equivalent, then if every french person wears a beret we would indeed expect to conclude that every french person "wears" Beret. Just as not all predicates are distributive (in all places), we might expect this disjunctive default to be overwritten sometimes for imaginaries, as in "pure-kind" predication. Martin --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk60fWoACgkQULC7OLX7LNYMagCfZq+/XWNd1i5lhNgwex8ENDlB /mUAn1b8TMlJfGeAHK8BEe5DIi/j95cn =OBJo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ--