Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:39078)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCOTEtqyUDhCDr9X1BBoETsux_w@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RMiGR-00006m-Sd; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:34:43 -0700
Received: by iage36 with SMTP id e36sf5830276iag.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key
         :x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi:user-agent:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=P9EFLmO55llQaAnyyJthKaOj9RmrTqJsv+/JetXjQho=;
        b=VN9p+wWaAoksTuIwy/ZGdboMAiOUjJpUHPNZpekqd5O1uNd3W7lNO/FyB57VnrNQB8
         +bMWBlom7nG4nVFDdN3mYc6MsUY5VskrpuioY0XlkDHFNaaELahHdpRLzIb2xatD8bSy
         cAgDrJIrZSe737wE9WG9/ic2UAVtt872y9rtI=
Received: by 10.50.168.70 with SMTP id zu6mr1909711igb.5.1320507267431;
        Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.65.66 with SMTP id h2ls9274723ibi.2.gmail; Sat, 05 Nov
 2011 08:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.48.202 with SMTP id ux10mr28953944icb.6.1320507266472;
        Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.48.202 with SMTP id ux10mr28953942icb.6.1320507266459;
        Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l3si9283484pbd.0.2011.11.05.08.34.26
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19;
Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4])
	by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pA5FYPn6009856
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:34:26 GMT
Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.75)
	(envelope-from <mbays@sdf.org>)
	id 1RMiGH-0004rx-Ho
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 11:34:25 -0400
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 11:34:25 -0400
From: Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
Message-ID: <20111105153425.GH24058@gonzales>
References: <4EAC2461.4040307@gmail.com>
 <20111029172822.GC9385@gonzales>
 <4EAC5B24.4000604@gmail.com>
 <20111103234955.GA3758@gonzales>
 <4EB43035.6040407@gmail.com>
 <20111104233756.GB24058@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2dzo0vjzQLwQObDo3GnOrjvEEE6_6K1wb0+a=On-H_gzw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111105051200.GD24058@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2cWRu-KW8Nbd7+a1fpB9va=YinWw=L73WDppcc2=_YSMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111105151953.GG24058@gonzales>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rV8arf8D5Dod9UkK"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111105151953.GG24058@gonzales>
X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc
X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6
X-cunselcu'a-valsi: xadni
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /


--rV8arf8D5Dod9UkK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Saturday, 2011-11-05 at 11:19 -0400 - Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>:

> ta'o nai, what about
> {pa xabju cu turni ro xabju}?
> Based on the berets example, it seems you would want to interpret this
> as "residents govern all residents", i.e. the same as for {ro xabju cu
> se turni lo xabju} above?
>=20
> Or perhaps you wouldn't, but only because we have {xabju} on both the
> left and the right, blocking a domain with only one xabju? If so, how
> about {pa na'e xabju cu turni ro xabju}?

In light of your reply to And of a few minutes ago, I see that
I shouldn't be using {pa} here.

So make that {su'o na'e xabju cu turni ro xabju} - by analogy with the
berets, you'd hae that meaning that one-or-more *kinds* of non-resident
rule all residents - being something we could have deduced from {ro
xabju cu se turni su'o na'e xabju}?

--rV8arf8D5Dod9UkK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk61V4EACgkQULC7OLX7LNbLKgCfbAPOAbDxpyXhvGwGHsgwnNEO
dFYAoNHiCllQMyFfHaB3v6LdP+v7mZbx
=JuVb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rV8arf8D5Dod9UkK--