Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:44058)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRD64dX1BBoEjhrlfg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RMjxc-0000q6-1Y; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:23:21 -0700
Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf3415134bka.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=DPHrWr8DEF79hGilnaoaw11jAQVyJAdjd71X/vw0Jp0=;
        b=o7BpjfZwJ4JasHxg7TWozYspD0unotSUkGJmW0c1aDUWO4dwIihcX77KsroHSk+nNU
         LnyEgT7lgGZaT0k07V1WOcgUtdZ8MF3jXRs1sFJaHJL2lUrM5VMfBmuzxhqsmJCrHNKK
         tY/+DLHXsbOmvNS3S+dmpsQnmZGbrku5OPABI=
Received: by 10.204.150.197 with SMTP id z5mr742102bkv.25.1320513786124;
        Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.205.80.78 with SMTP id zt14ls12248037bkb.1.gmail; Sat, 05 Nov
 2011 10:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.143.143 with SMTP id v15mr254542bku.1.1320513785010;
        Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.143.143 with SMTP id v15mr254541bku.1.1320513784995;
        Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f43.google.com (mail-fx0-f43.google.com [209.85.161.43])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h3si6767677fao.3.2011.11.05.10.23.04
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.43;
Received: by mail-fx0-f43.google.com with SMTP id t9so5058676faa.30
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.112.10 with SMTP id im10mr3119020lab.2.1320513784829; Sat,
 05 Nov 2011 10:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 10:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20111105115950.GJ8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20111105115950.GJ8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 14:23:04 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2dD1Q+RwPYQ3jNwoatL+hiv_-Wd5vpwYHFPLM-N6GSZvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words, but general relevance: dai-like cmavo
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com, lojban-list@lojban.org
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> OK, so there's {dai}. =A0{.ui dai} means "you are happy, and I am also
> happy along with you".

It doesn't actually mean that, but it is an appropriate thing for me
to say when I feel (or imagine) that you are happy, and I am also
happy along with you.

> Similarily, I also want {.oi [I see that you are feeling this; I'm
> not myself, but I observe it in you]}. =A0Which, again, {za'a do
> dunku}, but when I'm in the flow speaking Lojban, I want a UI for
> it.

It is fine to just say ".oi" there. You are not saying it *to* the
baby, you are saying it *with* her. It works even better if you don't
use your own normal voice but a baby-like voice imitation. Remember
that the referent of "mi" can be more subtle than just your own old
self.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.