Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:63811) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RMla5-0001x3-Vt; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:07:08 -0700 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf3451423bka.16 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:06:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=4H5dAKHdUcArUHjR+/BcNG/y7TGEGk2M0lFbdmTMzLs=; b=j/Dot5lYWqCRWQPcvyGhyMyaRHAJb9UWaRCaWFqAAHSNy/Y5puO+m4UvvrW9mAxTtD nJ2o84mUk6t/VfjhClB7xZGTQwTSPo+zM9dO3fUM5VWqy5YtBQZefQg0rs66P+gCQZLb WgQ72V7RSExmUG86WquIEqiiTiOSS77GMvyVw= Received: by 10.204.18.198 with SMTP id x6mr1697128bka.16.1320520010556; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:06:50 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.33.136 with SMTP id h8ls9141964bkd.0.gmail; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.140.198 with SMTP id j6mr2342530bku.8.1320520009406; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.140.198 with SMTP id j6mr2342529bku.8.1320520009391; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i17si6898493fai.0.2011.11.05.12.06.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.53; Received: by faan15 with SMTP id n15so855191faa.12 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.75.15 with SMTP id w15mr33891496faj.9.1320520009215; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.81.66 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111104082822.GO27896@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20111101095715.GD15924@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111102003244.GK15924@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111104082822.GO27896@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:06:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Use fu'ivla more (was Re: [lojban] Supporting Lojbanic babies.) From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c1956116edb04b101863d X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --0015174c1956116edb04b101863d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Any better ideas for {menseika'e}? Simply menficka'e isn't gonna work I don't think, and I'm not sure what else I can use. I was a little skeptical about {sepli}. The context, by the way, was that I had gotten two people mixed up in my head, and couldn't recall which was which. > > Incidentally, it would be kinda nice if type 4s could have rafsi, > > so that you could coin just a few basic jargon concepts and then > > interrelate the others using lujvo. For example you could have a > > lujvo of "integrated circuit" and a handful of others and with a > > little more work you could coin a lot of the jargon hardware terms > > as lujvo. > > IIRC xorxes had a proposal there? > I of course meant "fu'ivla of "integrated circuit"". And maybe so; I know there's a proposal even in the CLL about cultural type 4 of a certain morphological form having rafsi. mu'o mi'e latros -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0015174c1956116edb04b101863d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Any better ideas for {menseika'e}? Simply menficka'e isn't gonn= a work I don't think, and I'm not sure what else I can use. I was a= little skeptical about {sepli}. The context, by the way, was that I had go= tten two people mixed up in my head, and couldn't recall which was whic= h.


> Incidentally, it would be kinda nice if type 4s could have rafsi,
> so that you could coin just a few basic jargon concepts and then
> interrelate the others using lujvo. For example you could have a
> lujvo of "integrated circuit" and a handful of others and wi= th a
> little more work you could coin a lot of the jargon hardware terms
> as lujvo.

IIRC xorxes had a proposal there?

I of course meant "fu'ivla of "integrated circuit""= . And maybe so; I know there's a proposal even in the CLL about cultura= l type 4 of a certain morphological form having rafsi.

mu'o mi&#= 39;e latros

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015174c1956116edb04b101863d--