Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:50852) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RMndC-0002cs-CV; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:18:34 -0700 Received: by wwg7 with SMTP id 7sf7628886wwg.16 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:18:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=2Ks6CoOldx5mghOAaflj8v3e7sD3zi2l7loEOq6bn4k=; b=RwqrmtaqRiaqwtElSf8BrKQsWo7USW8PMefDTmLl19BIsQ/oWGqXLPB8EuXaH6JU6e 2HnTtb0rIwXlMe5ZYHXTLvRn7/MvzSeIObDSrp8M9NXsuQZD96Fdfne9tuBPSbkXK5Ev Z7xtslelXbhfvUpULoKu0gfe73hDYRmlW6xjg= Received: by 10.216.161.7 with SMTP id v7mr873179wek.42.1320527895847; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:18:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.26.217 with SMTP id c65ls472826eea.2.canary; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.35.202 with SMTP id q10mr22197ebd.0.1320527893715; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.35.202 with SMTP id q10mr22196ebd.0.1320527893699; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com (mail-fx0-f41.google.com [209.85.161.41]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z20si2472360faf.1.2011.11.05.14.18.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.41; Received: by faaf16 with SMTP id f16so4996207faa.0 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:18:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.144.202 with SMTP id so10mr3494164lab.9.1320527893477; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 14:18:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111105201536.GB835@gonzales> References: <20111029172822.GC9385@gonzales> <4EAC5B24.4000604@gmail.com> <20111103234955.GA3758@gonzales> <4EB43035.6040407@gmail.com> <20111104233756.GB24058@gonzales> <4EB4A123.7030305@gmail.com> <20111105061247.GE24058@gonzales> <4EB526B7.7070008@gmail.com> <20111105172216.GI24058@gonzales> <20111105201536.GB835@gonzales> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 18:18:13 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > > I think I've made clear by now the sense in which it is effectively > ambiguous; if not, I can try to be clearer. I think I do get it. I just don't think it has anything to do with logical structure. > Assuming that is how {klesi} works (I find the gimste definition rather > unclear), we would have e.g. that a type of hat selkle su'o mapku gi'e > nai mapku. Consider "a beret is a type of hat". I would say "lo ranmapku cu klesi lo mapku". You may have to resort to sets: "lo'i ranmapku cu klesi lo'i mapku", but then you can't say something like "lo vi klesi be lo mapku cu melmau lo va klesi be lo mapku". You'd have to resort to "lo('e) mapku poi cmima lo vi klesi cu melmau lo('e) mapku poi cmima lo va klesi". (And still explain how "lo'e" works.) >> Presumably in Ready-Made there is only one level of events, so what >> does it mean for an event to rapli any number other than one? > > With events, something like Blobularity might well be appropriate - the > crucial point being that we have the tense system to specify carvings. > So a nu broda is like a quantity of water - you can carve it up > however you like and still get a nu broda. If it's only some predicates that you restrict to mundanes, why would "lo fasnu" or "lo rinka" not have the same problems of "lo mapku"? > The only obvious alternative would be to say something like that an > atomic nu broda corresponds to a connected component of the subset of > space-time at which {broda} holds, and that events with multiple > connected components are bunches. But I feel that might be too > restrictive - any examples to show that it is? We may have different ideas about what counts as "too restrictive". mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.