Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:38903) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RMvZg-0005Kq-HM; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:47:28 -0700 Received: by iage36 with SMTP id e36sf7230856iag.16 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:47:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :sender:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+gUKePdKtZV8IY7dXyKFRO8uGEIHBhGDm/FGlzyu6M4=; b=xFWCOEVFyEgag0bfnjBnADvm7JA98qpC5YQ0znp2z/6WUt/JUcusvUVrAWz0o2Il2h zhXV3rHPyxQBwllx39FoHhJ0XMT3QhuA1oVDDNIgSKgeqb+weAYYvuZEXoZ5iN2uPSWu mXDmrKIrssu6sCvjM4e7uAsJ07K7dyIl4/77s= Received: by 10.50.11.202 with SMTP id s10mr2493241igb.10.1320558431681; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:47:11 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.68.202 with SMTP id w10ls4608098ibi.7.gmail; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.176.130 with SMTP id be2mr11793087icb.3.1320558430354; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.176.130 with SMTP id be2mr11793085icb.3.1320558430334; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5si11417479pbe.2.2011.11.05.22.47.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RMvZV-0005Kk-FD for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:47:09 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RMvZU-0005Kd-OT; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:47:08 -0700 Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 22:47:08 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words, but general relevance: dai-like cmavo Message-ID: <20111106054708.GU8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com, lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20111105115950.GJ8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 02:23:04PM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Robin Lee Powell > wrote: > > > > OK, so there's {dai}. =A0{.ui dai} means "you are happy, and I am > > also happy along with you". >=20 > It doesn't actually mean that,=20 What does it mean then? > > Similarily, I also want {.oi [I see that you are feeling this; > > I'm not myself, but I observe it in you]}. =A0Which, again, {za'a > > do dunku}, but when I'm in the flow speaking Lojban, I want a UI > > for it. >=20 > It is fine to just say ".oi" there. You are not saying it *to* the > baby, you are saying it *with* her.=20 I'm sorry, I don't buy that at all. > It works even better if you don't use your own normal voice but a > baby-like voice imitation. Remember that the referent of "mi" can > be more subtle than just your own old self. {mi} isn't relevant here, IMO; UI are for directly expressing the emotions of the actual immediate speaker, regardless of what {mi} is bound to. Anything else is ... confusing, at the very least. If someone says {.ui} and I don't know if they are happy or if some random person around them is happy, the usefullness of UI has basically been totally destroyed as far as I can see. -Robin --=20 http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.