Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:52395)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCK30vq5WEPb72fUEGgSnn09D@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RN1sF-0007X6-6A; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 04:31:03 -0800
Received: by ggnr4 with SMTP id r4sf5371413ggn.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 04:30:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :sender:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-disposition;
        bh=Li4BmwVLg7toM1Y6ohH2FWmZcvXvAx9FOUwMafcMEME=;
        b=foNFEDSMgs6/YfHvBb8a9zhdENsalmTuvLNLXrfzarD14Mdc+YWJ/4UkRy7RClPhec
         hTZLmuoehHh2mJVLF+REpmupSlzN34ZJJVqV7uvcEBaV/i1jvDHBwyTFhK2I4/cxYuuT
         HB3Upq/z1cLggE5oYUggK90R/nOAstWX4E+PU=
Received: by 10.236.201.226 with SMTP id b62mr6134351yho.10.1320582646432;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 04:30:46 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.101.208.32 with SMTP id k32ls10224033anq.5.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov
 2011 04:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.156.98 with SMTP id l62mr4731010yhk.4.1320582645792;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 04:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.156.98 with SMTP id l62mr4731008yhk.4.1320582645743;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 04:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r5si12419949pbe.1.2011.11.06.04.30.45
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 04:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1RN1s4-0007X3-Lk
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 04:30:44 -0800
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 04:30:44 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words: "help"
Message-ID: <20111106123043.GH21434@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <20111106054303.GT8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <201111060536.48008.phma@phma.optus.nu>
 <589C646F-4710-497E-9D18-832E9F2DF8F2@switchb.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <589C646F-4710-497E-9D18-832E9F2DF8F2@switchb.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 07:11:22AM -0500, Kevin Reid wrote:
[other useful things snipped]
> 
> For language acquisition, shouldn't we prefer sentences with
> "simple words" over ones with lujvo, when the lujvo are there for
> a "variant" meaning rather than one that's fundamentally not a
> gismu?

I'me very much in favour of that.  I would perhaps say {tsali banro}
or {tsali binxo} rather than rely on tense ambiguity ({ba tsali} is
fine too), but if I can say it without lujvo, I will.  I'm trying to
avoid nesting, as well.

I mean, sometimes I just throw out a string of fully formed Lojban,
but that's what I'd do in English as well; "Who's an amazing girl?
You are!  Yes you are!" said slow and parentese, followed by fast
parentese saying "Who's going to marry some rich oil magnate and
support me in my old age with a house and 3 cars and a big screen
TV?  You are!  Yes you are!".  I enjoy that sort of over the top
silliness to break up all the language acquisition crap, and I doubt
it'll do them any harm. :)

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.