Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:35012) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RN409-0001nB-IM; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:47:17 -0800 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf3943801bka.16 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:47:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QyLpPr8BpOnlSRplwtzZf4tb3i/TT0Ojjkkax6QIbvk=; b=k+DV6b7GUaszjQ1rZIIxp36GdFC8QAU3hU6dQyQMnrEuFZNVNect09b8Xof5ojYDOw BZPiguDpiKDOBr1ciiXT3UL3fkV2Kg0LB1N5CsJBTMzq8lN1y/42Z2TWQgnAFpXr7mz9 NS7C2Hmc38TRwURd8XhbQP9MiAsx0RYnFp048= Received: by 10.204.9.214 with SMTP id m22mr1850908bkm.6.1320590823280; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:47:03 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.33.136 with SMTP id h8ls10361635bkd.0.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:47:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.184.2 with SMTP id ci2mr2647033bkb.7.1320590821974; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:47:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.184.2 with SMTP id ci2mr2647031bkb.7.1320590821961; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:47:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f50.google.com (mail-fx0-f50.google.com [209.85.161.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h3si8366284fao.3.2011.11.06.06.47.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:47:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.50; Received: by mail-fx0-f50.google.com with SMTP id r15so2524624faa.23 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:47:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.102.138 with SMTP id fo10mr4597085lab.44.1320590821798; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:47:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 06:47:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111106054708.GU8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20111105115950.GJ8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111106054708.GU8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 11:47:01 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words, but general relevance: dai-like cmavo From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com, lojban-list@lojban.org X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 02:23:04PM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Robin Lee Powell >> wrote: >> > >> > OK, so there's {dai}. =A0{.ui dai} means "you are happy, and I am >> > also happy along with you". >> >> It doesn't actually mean that, > > What does it mean then? It's an expression used to express a certain feeling, not to express a proposition, like your English sentence. Your English sentence expresses a proposition that describes the situation in which that feeling arises. But I had already said something like that, so presumably what you are saying is that "means" covers that? >> > Similarily, I also want {.oi [I see that you are feeling this; >> > I'm not myself, but I observe it in you]}. =A0Which, again, {za'a >> > do dunku}, but when I'm in the flow speaking Lojban, I want a UI >> > for it. >> >> It is fine to just say ".oi" there. You are not saying it *to* the >> baby, you are saying it *with* her. > > I'm sorry, I don't buy that at all. > >> It works even better if you don't use your own normal voice but a >> baby-like voice imitation. Remember that the referent of "mi" can >> be more subtle than just your own old self. > > {mi} isn't relevant here, IMO; Forget I mentioned "mi" then. Whenever you say something, you may be lending your voice to speak in the name of a group. > UI are for directly expressing the > emotions of the actual immediate speaker, regardless of what {mi} is > bound to. =A0Anything else is ... confusing, at the very least. And yet that's how language seems to work. How would you say "ouch!" to your baby under the same conditions, if you were speaking in English rather than in Lojban? >=A0If > someone says {.ui} and I don't know if they are happy or if some > random person around them is happy, the usefullness of UI has > basically been totally destroyed as far as I can see. We don't usually see people expressing the feelings of random people around them, so we probably don't need to worry about that. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.