Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:56995)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNf8pM-bDBDIkNv1BBoEdxgQUQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RN6pT-000395-4p; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:48:34 -0800
Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4sf5087238gyg.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:48:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=iI+nKgc+8fF2sMyWsxm/xEVCQvvuv8DsvE5iSMfymZM=;
        b=2DfTwN7cAF25U1B5SZcbjLIiUjR5KCj3XX0zNl4z+qbLDg42naSMVyJw4rC2QnHAjH
         2y9lDwBF2GURkf/ZJOL7OzdphvNaSLeY6P9RMqORGGXm1eQ7EJ2Wmd9mdPjmv2bHMEcQ
         ZXg4j7w/Uq+HrFi0EZRXFB9pfMTQ6pR6ObyDc=
Received: by 10.236.176.103 with SMTP id a67mr5581413yhm.7.1320601672642;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:47:52 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.150.41.17 with SMTP id o17ls7960632ybo.2.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov
 2011 09:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.131.49 with SMTP id l37mr12418527yhi.0.1320601671492;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.131.49 with SMTP id l37mr12418524yhi.0.1320601671483;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f52.google.com (mail-yw0-f52.google.com [209.85.213.52])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v44si3852801yhd.1.2011.11.06.09.47.51
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.52;
Received: by ywm13 with SMTP id 13so6016174ywm.39
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:47:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.13.6 with SMTP id d6mr6298373obc.11.1320601671358; Sun, 06
 Nov 2011 09:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.182.29.226 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 09:47:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EB6BD58.8000105@gmail.com>
References: <12594199.557.1320597895175.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqni5>
	<4EB6BD58.8000105@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 17:47:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPAJj9LGx6FHNjrwUjyvZVkqdso2mamfiR9wyDeDO1Qr80068A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] And now for something completely different
From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.52 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On 6 November 2011 17:01, vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/06/2011 10:44 AM, djandus wrote:
>> Quick translation questions! (Not baby related!)
>>
>> I'm trying to translate "Are you crazy?!" Ignoring attitudinals, is this
>> the most efficient way?
>> =A0.i xu da pe do fenki
>>
>> mu'o mi'e djos
>
> Why not just say {.i xu do fenki}?
>
> Also, I suspect that tolracli may be closer to the intended meaning than
> fenki.

Should it even be a real question? The phrase in many cases suggests
that the speaker thinks the addressee IS crazy in a certain way, not
actually expecting an answer from them.

mu'o

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.