Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:55512) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RN80f-0003fB-Kc; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:04:02 -0800 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf4040803bka.16 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:03:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=n8/YYKjtgO4FWqL5vOeYD3rSC9Ep4BpmpLtrnHiNvlI=; b=bN3Ko8vXe9ePqvrZuwwOcBGqoB7lvkKCyBQNO5uGHghe7VKw3XpV3vrW5psYdUu9Bn gprwobvwr9CIynlXXUyN2H8RJ6XJESPS6gWrNEbHy1ElGH3AE3mI9Jn42idIFQ3QuqDy 7Zh4HQ00rSPvACc/q/UXdgo3AkvJLvQDo38M4= Received: by 10.205.130.136 with SMTP id hm8mr55165bkc.29.1320606231374; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:03:51 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.33.136 with SMTP id h8ls10605773bkd.0.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.154.136 with SMTP id o8mr2743485bkw.2.1320606230350; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.154.136 with SMTP id o8mr2743484bkw.2.1320606230332; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com (mail-fx0-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z20si2973347faf.1.2011.11.06.11.03.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.52; Received: by faan26 with SMTP id n26so7753909faa.39 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:03:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.106.130 with SMTP id gu2mr5053147lab.37.1320606230170; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 11:03:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1320600072.82050.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20111104233756.GB24058@gonzales> <4EB4A123.7030305@gmail.com> <20111105061247.GE24058@gonzales> <4EB526B7.7070008@gmail.com> <20111105172216.GI24058@gonzales> <20111105201536.GB835@gonzales> <20111105233402.GA2831@gonzales> <20111106033146.GC2831@gonzales> <1320585372.5586.YahooMailRC@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1320600072.82050.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 16:03:50 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, John E Clifford wrot= e: > I have avoided talking about gadri other than {lo} and {le} because I thi= nk > that, until those two are clarified, talk about the others is spinning wh= eels in > midair. There is, of course also the problem that no one is sure what "se= t" and > "mass" mean at this point. I don't remember ever being much disagreement about "lo'i". We sort of take it straight out of set theory. > I am only mildly surprised that you claim that lionness is not a possible > meaning for {cinfo}, but the way that you state it fails to convince, sin= ce, in > (lo ka cinof na cinfo} you have set up a context in which lioness is set = up in > opposition to whatever {cinfo} now means. =A0This does not preclude {lo c= info}, > for example, referring to lionness in an appropriate situation. =A0If you= hold > that no situation could be appropriate for that meaning, then I wonder a = bit > about your commitment to blobularism or about what limits you have (unsta= tedly) > placed on the blob. I'd have to see what kind of situation you have in mind. The reason I think lo ka cinfo and lo'i cinfo are different is that lo cinfo for me needs tobe able to have skin, to have color, to roar, to eat, and all other things lions can do, and I can't really picture sets or properties doing any of these things. It may also very well be that what you mean by "lionness" is not what I mean by "lo ka cinfo". mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.