Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:38945) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RN8ta-0003xw-Af; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:00:53 -0800 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20sf8488713wye.16 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:00:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=mu4qAHc95yubb0aiOsN+ETBb2n10w/ojcsFo5d6DoUk=; b=R2RLMPwnHVOBRRvGK+3vTrOoa0Kvw/IaH/E9Gv3eZuz14gEtFDWAiXiLgAcNUB+5cT DpOmbfvCFyNUuQ0AnGlJlpWqrhqPw4+d6gZB1u4vqGt0O99f8Z35O8VzGDpkO4bMj0u/ 8gHRgOje4ApwNi+SVCldzPgCqiG68ZJzyEm+E= Received: by 10.216.139.222 with SMTP id c72mr752108wej.13.1320609635917; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:00:35 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.24.83 with SMTP id w59ls1152551eew.6.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.17.75 with SMTP id i51mr1246185eei.1.1320609634744; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.17.75 with SMTP id i51mr1246184eei.1.1320609634728; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com. [75.180.132.122]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id j6si7490259qct.1.2011.11.06.12.00.34; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.122; X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=dNAkaZlb c=1 sm=0 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=6ti_TD8eFm8A:10 a=v-e_UCCTQVEA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=Ip5AdMBWi6Fw7bFUYX8A:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:38450] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 62/25-16605-167E6BE4; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:00:33 +0000 Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2816E2091B for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:00:33 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] skari Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 16:00:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <9080d508-6c45-431d-91f5-cc2cdae68ae1@q13g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201111061500.29608.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Sunday 06 November 2011 13:48:55 Sebastian Fr=F6jd wrote: > well, I can't really drop this topic. > I now agree with you that gismu should be left vague. Anyway, when I firs= t > came in contact with lojban I thought that it was pretty cool to think > about the exact meaning of words; to be unambigous, not only grammatical > but also semantically. > > So isn't it possible to construct a color system with lujvos, which has > exact definitions without being to technical (=3Dusing numbers) each time= you > would like to use them? My color definition system would be very > consistent, and I would like to use it, even if not all lojbanists would. > > So my question is: what prefix would I use to distinguish my color > definitions from the more vague standard? > my suggestion is {marxu'e} or {na'orxu'e} for red #FF0000. What do you > think? There are different kinds of colors: colors of emitted light, colors of=20 reflecting surfaces, and idealized color spaces. Among the human population= ,=20 there are at least three alleles of the red-seeing gene (normal, anomalous,= =20 and blind), at least two of the green-seeing gene (ditto), and at least two= =20 of the blue. It is thus possible for a woman to have five primary colors.= =20 (Both red and green are on X, only one of which is expressed per cell.) And= =20 I, a mutant of the red-seeing gene, sometimes see things I want to=20 call "gred" or "grellow". Then there's bicnukni. That's #FF00FF, where the= =20 first byte is green and the third is ultraviolet. So #FF0000 is OK for=20 {ma'orxu'e}, as long as you remember that you're talking about a color spac= e=20 and not a pure spectral line or paint. Pierre --=20 .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.