Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:56768)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRCB39v1BBoEQVBbxA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RN9R4-0004Ev-K6; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:35:31 -0800
Received: by ggnr4 with SMTP id r4sf6024079ggn.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:35:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id
         :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:subject:to
         :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=/ILrWhr9mCqtkwRSNpSIFO2/bO2UzYs+5pAGSlYma28=;
        b=536SwKFkwzVGTdkt4O3aMaZs3NyULpgUqfVUl2SLoOkVOVF9Qer3sI3I10FIlMDt5T
         4Q0DWPSNpulRjQyYe+qAEdGHuq6rAsaI4DHVjc1i+P8+gaN7SF+tLBFvMimFnTLoFps7
         P2JQG7DuTI07XenFZy4Cb7pK/6MtlvlKapZm8=
Received: by 10.236.161.34 with SMTP id v22mr6376296yhk.9.1320611713684;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:35:13 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.100.236.2 with SMTP id j2ls9017516anh.0.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov
 2011 12:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.101.171.26 with SMTP id y26mr5741901ano.19.1320611712663;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.101.171.26 with SMTP id y26mr5741900ano.19.1320611712648;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm12-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm12-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.236.11])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id f15si9958392anq.1.2011.11.06.12.35.12;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.11 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.236.11;
Received: from [66.94.237.198] by nm12.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Nov 2011 20:35:12 -0000
Received: from [66.94.237.98] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Nov 2011 20:35:12 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1003.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Nov 2011 20:35:12 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 375907.54083.bm@omp1003.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 37162 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Nov 2011 20:35:12 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: _urQRRYVM1kPeOtOtziDDSGvrRRNXTeAz7uxYDZCu8v8u1b
 yavNEqK9l9YOHs2j_wZsB1cE1g.IPtQ87UapmQfyS2Mi1LYJ5cEcw8U6PpYo
 iQJMzRu26JiYm7KKtxWlvDBEQn3P22gQTK5NEK2KzqLwWoBlGXZoBmFY0moc
 KfdEPi1hM1yFXomA0ebVZ1hvgmejmNi838EH2KXgQwQ5_05cbzLnBx2ksd7u
 DDJz25Huipcu_izuVcR8mHDBaipRjsjEV7Jxi_txhPOOJ7GG6h_zMgddQs60
 ERsWx1eN.HuLlFmQPrZbyyysyDCvzT3uoIwIOuvFMtFfW1UixGT9sxj.b1N4
 9e7r4IlwowxNa1D9n7UlYjEm8Blut5vkorZjRT6VSyyQx_o07.taRrwj.bbq
 GyOdr6BAE7zRQ7Mlgf2g_96L_VhyqGN9yaWLt2KXfEbz9zjTiQKmOkmQAVnH
 vUD3KBzhzMGy6ixC7uX5ZlKi3ezvrpffus1WuyTLalbfJGPSv2c132MI2P_q
 Mk7qc6j5pjw5ni7E.kf.1wSfCJQRkD7NLpmxJMFF0
Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:35:12 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/574 YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681
References: <20111105172216.GI24058@gonzales> <CAO7tK2dug7A3=o873E=uLCKT3047yU2y0wfqV0NADRtcJ7agTg@mail.gmail.com> <20111105201536.GB835@gonzales> <CAO7tK2exiMaR4r2D+C6PezFOXVHL_uTc5YPxvAf4m515-Pt+7Q@mail.gmail.com> <20111105233402.GA2831@gonzales> <CAO7tK2fYiAW_zW6eqo3hrvbD3tKE5j6R8LAa2nXRmtRisg469g@mail.gmail.com> <20111106033146.GC2831@gonzales> <1320585372.5586.YahooMailRC@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111106151024.GA3071@gonzales> <1320600390.91293.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111106190215.GA27091@gonzales> <4EB6ECDD.1020202@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1320611712.34869.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 12:35:12 -0800 (PST)
From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <4EB6ECDD.1020202@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.11
 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

Well, given the permutations that xorlo has gone through over the years since it 
became official, there were probably times when it was overtly bloburist, though 
the usual state seems to me to have been Readymadeist (if if you want to insist 
on a difference), as witness the introduction of plural reference, which was 
thought a big step forward.  Of course, I know that xorxes has always had 
inchoate and usually terribly ill-formed blobularist ideas in mind, but none of 
them ever eventuated in any of the "final" versions of xorlo and usually 
disappeared without a trace or with only the salvageable (readymadeist) parts.



----- Original Message ----
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, November 6, 2011 2:23:57 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural 
variable

Martin Bays, On 06/11/2011 19:02:
> * Sunday, 2011-11-06 at 09:26 -0800 - John E Clifford<kali9putra@yahoo.com>:
>
>> The fact that something can screw up in English seem poor evidence that the
>> "corresponding" thing screws up in Lojban.
>
>> So I am uncionvinced.
>
> What are you unconvinced by? That this "screw up" occurs in xorxes and
> and's understanding of lojban? Or that their understanding is correct
> (whatever that means)?

Regarding understanding of Lojban, I think pretty much all jboskepre understand 
that 99% of what jboskepre discuss is currently undefined for Lojban, not 
necessarily because it is so arcane but more because, at least until Robin tried 
to change this last year or thereabouts, there was no mechanism for completing 
the official specification of Lojban. However, I gather that xorlo did become 
official. It seems odd that anybody would be unconvinced that xorlo was 
Blobularist, at least in intention, though perhaps somebody might want to try to 
argue that xorlo needn't be Blobularist. So the focus of the discussion has been 
on the putative problems of Blobularism and therefore of xorlo.

--And.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.