Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:42927)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJzE7b_XFxCo4Nv1BBoE3muP6Q@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RN9Tl-0004HL-67; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:38:10 -0800
Received: by qan41 with SMTP id 41sf4666024qan.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:38:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references
         :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=wddoyKJQIKMKYEmEu28qNfkyxiwkP9HlszdMFY4sLho=;
        b=xIA5SBt8u8iiXSN4pKq4eGr7BB/Nvv33//kMgxrMuxoDbB7DZgs4d7SH0xKsk+Gieb
         1684fNXoR0JtcbTBbZ4yVIVB0IlROJIGvYtQqtst5cHNd8uRicNkQ1UiTTI1XQaSve9R
         wUpuNihn4pdNn2BQM10tsS5/XoJlbVnWMecBg=
Received: by 10.224.105.199 with SMTP id u7mr294626qao.17.1320611880051;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:38:00 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.73.197 with SMTP id r5ls4942532qaj.4.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov
 2011 12:37:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.52.81 with SMTP id h17mr4289773qag.0.1320611879512;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:37:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 12:37:59 -0800 (PST)
From: djandus <jandew@gmail.com>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <15929484.1788.1320611879127.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbl36>
In-Reply-To: <201111061439.49262.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <12594199.557.1320597895175.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqni5> <4EB6BD58.8000105@gmail.com> <4875586.1227.1320601686280.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqhd1>
 <201111061439.49262.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Subject: Re: [lojban] And now for something completely different
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: jandew@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 jandew@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jandew@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1787_12063533.1320611879125"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_1787_12063533.1320611879125
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That was what I had tried before {da pe do fenki}, but I thought that it=20
might be clearer the other way... Tell me if I'm thinking through any of=20
the following wrong.

I've been thinking of {tu'a do} as "There's a specific abstraction=20
involving you that I have in mind, but it's really not worth  the effort to=
=20
express it." So, I would translate {tu'a do fenki} as=20
"some-abstraction-involving you is-crazy"

On the other hand . . .

I've been thinking of {da pe do} as "There is something that is associated=
=20
with you, and it's not necessarily like ownership." So then, if the x=E2=82=
=81=20
place of {fenki} is for actions/events, then it {da pe do} automatically=20
does what {tu'a do} does (says there's an abstraction involving you) as=20
well as saying the relationship is a loose association not necessarily like=
=20
ownership. (as oppose to the space of any possible abstraction, which=20
usually are nothing like possession) So I figured you can get more quickly=
=20
to the sorts of things I need to say, like "Your thoughts/actions are=20
crazy." which feels more like a loose possessive...

mu'o mi'e djos

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo=
jban/-/4HUTYUK6DW0J.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.


------=_Part_1787_12063533.1320611879125
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That was what I had tried before {da pe do fenki}, but I thought that it mi=
ght be clearer the other way... Tell me if I'm thinking through any of the =
following wrong.<div><br></div><div>I've been thinking of {tu'a do} as "The=
re's a specific abstraction involving you that I have in mind, but it's rea=
lly not worth &nbsp;the effort to express it." So, I would translate {tu'a =
do fenki} as "some-abstraction-involving you is-crazy"</div><div><br></div>=
<div>On the other hand . . .</div><div><br></div><div>I've been thinking of=
 {da pe do} as "There is something that is associated with you, and it's no=
t necessarily like ownership." So then, if the x=E2=82=81 place of {fenki} =
is for actions/events, then it {da pe do} automatically does what {tu'a do}=
 does (says there's an abstraction involving you) as well as saying the rel=
ationship is a loose association not necessarily like ownership. (as oppose=
 to the space of any possible abstraction, which usually are nothing like p=
ossession) So I figured you can get more quickly to the sorts of things I n=
eed to say, like "Your thoughts/actions are crazy." which feels more like a=
 loose possessive...</div><div><br></div><div>mu'o mi'e djos</div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/4HUTYUK6DW0J">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/4H=
UTYUK6DW0J</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_1787_12063533.1320611879125--