Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:44370) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNBMS-0004y6-Ah; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:38:54 -0800 Received: by ywa17 with SMTP id 17sf6131731ywa.16 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:38:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:subject:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YMH9p2HdNyh/LrFVuSqPwyNvrFCtMsz/ouccP1Y+OIE=; b=xndzU8Md4aO5DtFMVHdUUbdysprsSODWM7Xu2vTQHZbGlJH8y+3RCjUsHkVAtch4lS GKvEjlWawxKLaygN4ClBdffjAwcw275COnq/QPY2q7Tbo4m4ou9UvREhEAGQC+DULbRh 90rM7yP+XJvjI3kCQxMTlsWt7z4GYwNpHwxCc= Received: by 10.236.161.165 with SMTP id w25mr6477100yhk.15.1320619115151; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:38:35 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.55.11 with SMTP id h11ls10831310ank.4.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.182.19 with SMTP id j19mr6371984anp.2.1320619114295; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.182.19 with SMTP id j19mr6371983anp.2.1320619114282; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from nm16.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm16.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.237.217]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id g4si10145830anh.0.2011.11.06.14.38.34; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.217 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.217; Received: from [66.94.237.126] by nm16.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Nov 2011 22:38:34 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.108] by tm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Nov 2011 22:38:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Nov 2011 22:38:33 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 983262.63570.bm@omp1013.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 95711 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Nov 2011 22:38:33 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 7D1lVZYVM1kNZ5dnWG3tIJ7UojBhy98vmRilHlpeQwsPpS0 AbqJoh2bOTAu4c4_IiJRKUjXfot.s1cXLW.PfURS7sMCjlr4HMq.3ET9JmnT QrsAUbYhzrWEnjWrjk.eM_xEgeDzRQpOFGoYbnPdAbEOrk.zf8pj_WRALvkh X1eJYvTr09KmCBvylXwTU5GMP9grbxCzoPWmYqK2FmShsnZ4ztu4gfRb4sGH o74Gg2e5WUoL0JgEOhMbUHyRTaj9OuZl0uoqiNsvjUCWwSuvlNmun12dHket NUT5FiaT_XEBPvnNYHZrHyaTtFYYDBA8KewI4bNBRs_q3Qoyx4yYY_T393ol JLCzd34hD7.d0AnBC2mPAfEut1espDjeHCBSJ4tev6_oa3nAdrAB3Nzcmj.4 VqEqODj_iT2I8DTwpFVzOJzN4QYi1ihN7zEslyvpT2kqk7ZTKMy_6zCFV Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:38:33 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/574 YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 References: <20111105172216.GI24058@gonzales> <20111105201536.GB835@gonzales> <20111105233402.GA2831@gonzales> <20111106033146.GC2831@gonzales> <20111106182701.GA2703@gonzales> <20111106211140.GC2703@gonzales> Message-ID: <1320619113.80678.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 14:38:33 -0800 (PST) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: <20111106211140.GC2703@gonzales> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / persnickety, ----- Original Message ---- From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Sun, November 6, 2011 3:11:41 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural= =20 variable * Sunday, 2011-11-06 at 17:15 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > > * Sunday, 2011-11-06 at 12:56 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Martin Bays wrote: > >> That says something quite different though. It doesn't even preclude > >> the possibility that every ranmapku is bolmapku as long as there is > >> one bolmapku that is not ranmapku. > > > > Does ficysi'u? >=20 > Hmm... I think so, yes. >=20 > If you are quantifying over mundane hats, then saying that at least > one of them is either a beret or a bowler but not both is not much > like saying that berets and bowler hats are different kinds of hats. I > think you would need to say that everything is either a beret, a > bowler, or neither. (And the double exclusive or is hard!) Hmm? Why not just {no da ranmapku gi'e bolmapku}? > And even so, mere set disjointness doesn't seem to get at the heart of > the matter, which is probably in the x3 of klesi: >=20 > "lo ranmapku jo'u lo bolmapku cu ficysi'u lo ka ce'u klesi lo mapku ma ka= u" Yes, good. So I'd want to add three characters: {lo ranmaplei jo'u lo bolmaplei cu ficysi'u lo ka ce'u klesi lo maplei ma k= au} > >> Why is beret - hat - garment artificial? > > But they're all on the same level, no? > As kinds? A beret is a kind of hat, and a hat is a kind of garment. I'm only seeing two levels there - one containing berets and hats, and one containing kinds of hat and kinds of garment. > > It's true that it isn't clear what a valsi is. I do believe that this > > should be clarified. My take would be that a valsi is an abstract > > entity, as are jufras and selskus; that {zo mupli} has a single > > referent, like (qkauless) {lo ka broda}; and that what these pixels > > glowing on your monitor are doing is sinxaing valsis. The valsis > > themselves may sinxa concepts, and we can skip a level and say that the > > pixels sinxa the concepts. > > > > I suppose you would have the pixel-valsis sinxaing the abstract-valsis, > > but also valsiing whatever it is the abstract-valsis valsi? >=20 > I would want to say "mi kancu lo valsi poi dei vasru ku'o li pa pa". Well, I would probably be pernickety and demand {valsi nunsku} in place of {valsi}. This does not give you licence to call me pernickety when I demand {mapku klesi} ;) Martin --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.