Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:61826) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNBQR-00051B-4m; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:55 -0800 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf4100406bka.16 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IIiFp8u7GHxg/HA/q78EsPdeGzGhxSbvpsOr6wTE7mg=; b=t5bhncFCgIBkq3V63Cha5m/+N93gyohEWBg2CJXcD0ZPsoYMR1lju3+xqjxDoC1Tns Rp2IVr3/MkNyvzJLTxjDQQQyGvGmfmFmPlio0M6r/j2F41itQcZEFKJ7eKIclZeRvxNk s2GPHedTpFQe+AdpptlrtqlDeABxY8DSrYzwI= Received: by 10.204.144.73 with SMTP id y9mr2465728bku.0.1320619360580; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:40 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.205.80.78 with SMTP id zt14ls14070952bkb.1.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.154.136 with SMTP id o8mr2810738bkw.2.1320619359483; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.154.136 with SMTP id o8mr2810736bkw.2.1320619359468; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com (mail-fx0-f46.google.com [209.85.161.46]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p12si211009fad.1.2011.11.06.14.42.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.46; Received: by mail-fx0-f46.google.com with SMTP id o14so4562821faa.19 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.102.138 with SMTP id fo10mr5424720lab.44.1320619359323; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 14:42:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111106221157.GE2703@gonzales> References: <20111105201536.GB835@gonzales> <20111105233402.GA2831@gonzales> <20111106033146.GC2831@gonzales> <20111106182701.GA2703@gonzales> <20111106211140.GC2703@gonzales> <20111106221157.GE2703@gonzales> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 19:42:39 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > * Sunday, 2011-11-06 at 18:58 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : >> >> You could extend that method to all predicates. So instead of: >> >> =A0 lo prenu cu klama lo zarci lo zdani lo dargu lo karce >> >> you can say: >> >> =A0 lo prekla cu klama lo zacyselkla lo zdaterkla lo dagvelkla lo karcyx= elkla > > Are you mocking me? zo'o Only on the surface. :) > There's no problem with prenu klamaing; there is a problem with ranmapku > klesiing. But maybe someone else does have a problem with prenu klamaing, this method would solve it. The difficulty arises when you want to apply the method to "lo prenu cu klama gi'e tavla", or, in your case, to "lo ranmapku cu klesi lo mapku gi'e cmamau lo bolmapku". How do I know whether "lo ranmaplei ka'e cmalu"? >> >> >> Why is beret - hat - garment artificial? >> >> > But they're all on the same level, no? >> >> As kinds? A beret is a kind of hat, and a hat is a kind of garment. >> > >> > I'm only seeing two levels there - one containing berets and hats, and >> > one containing kinds of hat and kinds of garment. >> >> One level contains the garment, next level down the hat, next level >> down the beret (and a fourth level I hadn't mentioned because it won't >> enter into a klesi relationship contains some particular individual >> beret.) So "klesi" relates two things from different levels. > > Oh, no, we're not using the same definition of 'level'. > > I was reserving that for the problematic case, where going up a level > corresponding to passing from AE to EA. I believe this corresponds to > (your version of) {mupli}. > > I meant to ask for a natural example where we go up two mupli-levels > from mundanes. lo vi ranmapku cu mupli lo ranmapku noi mupli lo mapku noi mupli lo taxfu But I admit I became lost as to what we are after here. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.