Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:61539)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRD1qtz1BBoEtL4WTg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RNBxm-0005Ss-Th; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:26 -0800
Received: by wwg7 with SMTP id 7sf8963230wwg.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=+5C+eX/Wmbxks6LO7YBUMzK4Bdw7VBuWLEJ5PKvG26g=;
        b=ZUiOxi4ONfVLA6JNzdpeDA97hrYoV0/B6YZzJSt6fS50W+V27XLjJICg8vyMcOnfsX
         yq6Y5FNFP8UnfDVBfUKl9PbbSBWPC1mPLgn4NmixhXHUt6lGTtwXswLp09yb7ln7RWih
         SSp//1Nm2VhzEn/H7WX4c6NqKU8mD4/YqlwpE=
Received: by 10.216.230.219 with SMTP id j69mr950976weq.3.1320621429067;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:09 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.213.102.141 with SMTP id g13ls1287352ebo.0.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov
 2011 15:17:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.9.203 with SMTP id m11mr429108ebm.9.1320621428005;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.9.203 with SMTP id m11mr429107ebm.9.1320621427983;
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com (mail-fx0-f41.google.com [209.85.161.41])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t21si3084145faf.0.2011.11.06.15.17.07
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:07 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.41;
Received: by faaf16 with SMTP id f16so6279647faa.14
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.148.165 with SMTP id tt5mr5387489lab.23.1320621427797;
 Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:17:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111106230135.GM21434@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20111106230135.GM21434@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:17:07 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2e9RHVTDuT0LTqqtRi_X4iRmpR12DV2GxiFY9rEWqSeEg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words, sort of: catlu vs. zgana
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com, lojban-list@lojban.org
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> What's the difference here? =A0In particular, what does {catlu}
> actually mean? =A0Is it just like {zgana} but without a particular
> sense and conditions specified?

catlu =3D troci lo nu viska
zgana =3D troci lo nu ganse

> Which word is best for intent scrutiny? =A0How would you emphasize
> intent-ness there?

"Intent scrutiny" or "intense scrutiny"?

catlu/zgana both require intent.

I'm not sure what "intent scrutiny" means. I think "lanli" might be
better than catlu/zgana for "scrutinize".

"Intense scrutiny" could be "lo nu carmi lo ka lanli".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.