Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:39517) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNDGJ-0006Mt-UA; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:39 -0800 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20sf8756872wye.16 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Sx7r4YA+36rlh3i6Z/0OUdOjzAhNUJ8AwkkA+4cOHpQ=; b=zAN7/NvhSGNYe9AnCoA0jGAUdQm/MicLVZaft/cuZm5csVWk0OUw23bMzLS8Po6iwM gJnYDMGgEk0NiaIGdw+XuQynjgPlFBvFCJiwCTp5ILzknsuNE1gmLyviWa5mAxnnThqm LxsDnlbk/BD8JyxB5090Pzvnu2oCZiV8vCoAs= Received: by 10.216.138.26 with SMTP id z26mr949392wei.84.1320626421631; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:21 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.108.234 with SMTP id g42ls9622837wbp.0.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.203.7 with SMTP id fg7mr1699444wbb.4.1320626420657; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.203.7 with SMTP id fg7mr1699443wbb.4.1320626420618; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com (mail-wy0-f174.google.com [74.125.82.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k17si9029387wbo.1.2011.11.06.16.40.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.174; Received: by wyh15 with SMTP id 15so5652933wyh.33 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.163.203 with SMTP id a53mr2607614wel.35.1320626420492; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.84] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fi11sm25762491wbb.9.2011.11.06.16.40.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:40:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EB728F0.8080007@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:40:16 +0000 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable References: <20111104233756.GB24058@gonzales> <4EB4A123.7030305@gmail.com> <20111105061247.GE24058@gonzales> <4EB526B7.7070008@gmail.com> <20111105172216.GI24058@gonzales> <20111105201536.GB835@gonzales> <20111105233402.GA2831@gonzales> <20111106033146.GC2831@gonzales> <1320585372.5586.YahooMailRC@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1320600072.82050.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1320611296.51003.YahooMailRC@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4EB6F1CE.40204@gmail.com> <1320617343.1816.YahooMailRC@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1320617343.1816.YahooMailRC@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / John E Clifford, On 06/11/2011 22:09: > So, either the whole notion of having skin, etc. moves up and down with the > notion of lion, Yes. This. In Blobular. > or Lion is just a bunch of lions viewed in a certain way, > namely, apparently, without differentiating among the members That's right. A bunch of lions can be viewed as a bunch of one lion, with skin, four legs, etc. Maybe in Ready-Made {lo} would be defined as directly meaning bunches of all broda, without the oneness? >(ultimately > disjunctively). I'm perfectly happy to have Lion anything you want it to be > (within limits, of course -- I don't thing it should be a Zodiac), but tell me > what it is. If it is not a bunch then it is an equivalence class, in which case > why is the set of all lions excluded? And, of course, this does involve sliding > what "has a skin" means up and down along with {cinfo}. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.