Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:34348) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNK0b-0008JL-B3; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:52:56 -0800 Received: by ggnr4 with SMTP id r4sf6364689ggn.16 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:52:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :sender:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tKdJinxmRrVUFC9gDF8uRZ5TL8UiSxmVIuqEEYGxpsI=; b=CJREki1S6sIlgzi39FftKt+xd4Ul2l9bPJrQaKpqzfVxLewC2du/AVm0+jPjd3dlR1 nzDYxR2ux88fkbC6KnwXihMalS/AZAvDQ5uxzS9ivjH74gd9zF79KkeyEgVNGeY73dvb X14TKyNlNWBnbfkmrn0yNbAafrH13B8LXU+sI= Received: by 10.236.124.105 with SMTP id w69mr6962447yhh.5.1320652356513; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:52:36 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.208.32 with SMTP id k32ls11257358anq.5.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:52:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.246.3 with SMTP id lw3mr37288698icb.0.1320652354706; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:52:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.246.3 with SMTP id lw3mr37288697icb.0.1320652354697; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:52:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l3si15365925pbd.0.2011.11.06.23.52.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:52:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNK0P-0008Iy-DQ for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:52:33 -0800 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 23:52:33 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] babies: "you might as well sleep" Message-ID: <20111107075233.GL21492@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20111104115329.GG30208@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111105124409.GP8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111106053616.GR8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:40:30PM +0000, tijlan wrote: > On 6 November 2011 05:36, Robin Lee Powell > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 11:05:58AM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Robin Lee Powell > >> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 10:37:29AM -0300, Jorge Llambías > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> "might as well" means "have no reason not to", so you could > >> >> say ".ei no da fanta lo nu do sipna". > >> > > >> > What's the {.ei} there for? > >> > >> Just to make it a little less presumptuous: "there ought to be > >> nothing preventing you from sleeping" instead of a plain > >> "nothing prevents you from sleeping". You could leave it out > >> too. > > > > Huh. That's not what I think {.ei} means at all. I read that > > as "I, the speaker, am feeling obligated/constrained about > > something having to do with nothing preventing you from > > sleeping". I don't get your use there at all. > > The personal feeling that there is an obligation can be > independent of how the goal is to be achieved. For example, I > could be feeling that a broken public bridge in my town ought to > be repaired but not that the repairer ought to be me myself. {.ei > cikre lo cripu} wouldn't necessarily mean that the speaker is > feeling personally obligated to do anything for the bridge [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:40:30PM +0000, tijlan wrote: > On 6 November 2011 05:36, Robin Lee Powell > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 11:05:58AM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Robin Lee Powell > >> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 10:37:29AM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> "might as well" means "have no reason not to", so you could > >> >> say ".ei no da fanta lo nu do sipna". > >> > > >> > What's the {.ei} there for? > >> > >> Just to make it a little less presumptuous: "there ought to be > >> nothing preventing you from sleeping" instead of a plain > >> "nothing prevents you from sleeping". You could leave it out > >> too. > > > > Huh. =A0That's not what I think {.ei} means at all. =A0I read that > > as "I, the speaker, am feeling obligated/constrained about > > something having to do with nothing preventing you from > > sleeping". =A0I don't get your use there at all. >=20 > The personal feeling that there is an obligation can be > independent of how the goal is to be achieved. For example, I > could be feeling that a broken public bridge in my town ought to > be repaired but not that the repairer ought to be me myself. {.ei > cikre lo cripu} wouldn't necessarily mean that the speaker is > feeling personally obligated to do anything for the bridge I *strongly* disagree. The whole *point* of UI is that they express immediate emotions *of the speaker*. See http://dag.github.com/cll/13/3/ > any more than that {cikre lo cripu} just ought to be brought about > by whatever agent. UI are not propositions. -Robin --=20 http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.