Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:62966) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRP6-0006bq-1S; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:46:38 -0800 Received: by ggnr4 with SMTP id r4sf6547605ggn.16 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:46:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:subject:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hmwx5uBPsZWrsSufQ3rhwBqtcnUkQPp22IIf1w1eQD4=; b=fKBsrkLymDdob0O0jH4efE0UJGtihdUebBMCrwsfFUkfifVNaxYzhBmrp1elRxf58l ivwCB6neffgWCwWneoHRkxrs8Y5+Bkw1iH572Sd2Utr6cRfN9ltSSZ39ios3wRrKmDgM sLLN49f/bXclG3wTdSZDseYH5x5wQ5R0ApcK4= Received: by 10.236.73.134 with SMTP id v6mr5542358yhd.12.1320680541695; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:42:21 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.237.8 with SMTP id k8ls11865747anh.2.gmail; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:42:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.193.18 with SMTP id v18mr6383398anp.13.1320680540072; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:42:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.193.18 with SMTP id v18mr6383396anp.13.1320680540051; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:42:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nm23-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm23-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.236.141]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id 24si3517698ybx.2.2011.11.07.07.42.19; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:42:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.141 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.236.141; Received: from [66.94.237.197] by nm23.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2011 15:42:19 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.96] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2011 15:42:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2011 15:42:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 716297.82148.bm@omp1001.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 36403 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Nov 2011 15:42:19 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: L0TYazgVM1k_oxH70hEPZ8QOCV4Hn0VUEDtwEcwYvUNx6BD rG81us7gZU8CEeGIge3a1uOupmOuV7vQ2R23iDnQY_5Xed5h7.s_5rfY2_Y0 DoQjpgBwDEjnzGQv9jL8yhCEDY7xQYkGv8FaQd4HGBLgpK0jFjuO43hnhEFK Qhke0k2nxNx.iWsgoCApTHXAdgVywdVhRqCM.yZ.cT5LAQe4Jz9C64K1ViF6 _mDhLeGCPh1GViBEkZ_OUbDnMqZ6HIprtLuYciH5psaZ3Yxi8W6mPFq96iXN zI9QtpflAvw5d4ATV68sIphJoXUbPifZbA_NDkEbHCMrIdLTFxlAbS7nYkh7 T2r8IcQ1cG1MxqQ4nydQsEeCg4x9JDuadgwPcKTOqgnqVFN6APsZ7FH1qHvC 7Fax5neoXS7whsAn5ZYsy1GhrtgzSDY5_yMXFBir0EeHgZXBFtkLab_rtcoP X1j4uDrvaXzSmMAMVqmRh4RBC.lVKw5NG0rchsM0i5kjQIo7vNnmlRHb8C8F tySb6n0wnqkLgqDt3il3kv.s- Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:42:19 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/574 YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 References: <20111029001437.GA5535@gonzales> <4EAC2461.4040307@gmail.com> <20111029172822.GC9385@gonzales> <4EAC5B24.4000604@gmail.com> <20111103234955.GA3758@gonzales> <4EB43035.6040407@gmail.com> <20111104233756.GB24058@gonzales> <4EB4A123.7030305@gmail.com> <20111105061247.GE24058@gonzales> <4EB526B7.7070008@gmail.com> <20111105172216.GI24058@gonzales> Message-ID: <1320680539.36060.YahooMailRC@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 07:42:19 -0800 (PST) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.141 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Why is there only one level in Ready-Made? I suspect that this is a straw = man=20 you have set up, but the characterization of it -- and of blobular -- are s= o=20 vague as to make a clear judgement difficult. I suspect that the only prob= lem=20 with levels is just that {lo broda cu klesi lo broda} shouldn't hold. Or t= hat,=20 in the same context, {broda} is used sometimes for avatars (exemplars, slic= es,=20 ordinary things) and sometimes for kinds/masses/properties. MB seems to be= =20 saying that you do do this, but his evidence is somewhat confusing itself (= using=20 quantifiers inappropriately, for example), so I am not sure you do (or don'= t,=20 for that matter). I do think, however, that there are limits as to how far= up=20 or don you can shove a predicate without some indication of the shove, but = I am=20 less sure what those limits are (using {cinfo} for what would normally be {= ka=20 cinfo}, something about functions from worlds to sets, for example, seems t= o far=20 up, using it for muscle fiber from a lion's leg muscle seems too far down -= - but=20 I am open to arguments either way). ----- Original Message ---- From: Jorge Llamb=EDas To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, November 5, 2011 1:18:54 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural= =20 variable On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > > To reiterate the point: allowing cinfo to be ambiguous between levels > is, by the definition of 'level', effectively equivalent to allowing the > logical structure of sentences which involve quantifying over cinfo to > be ambiguous. No, that's not true. Just because "ro broda cu brode" can have different meanings in different contexts does not mean that there is anything ambiguous about its logical structure. Its logical structure has nothing to do with the meaning of "broda" or of "brode". All the logical structure tells us is that any thing from the domain of discourse that satisfies the predicate broda, also satisfies the predicate brode. It tells us nothing about what things are in the domain of discourse or about what things satisfy broda or about what things satisfy brode. > So where does this leave Blobularism? I fear it leaves it needing to > find a way to specify the levels its carving the Blob to. Sorry. There are some level-mixing predicates. The ones that come to mind are "klesi", "krefu" and "rapli". The x1 of klesi is at a lower level than the x2. The x1 of krefu is at a lower level than the x2. In the case of rapli, there is only one level for its arguments, but x2 counts things that are at a lower level than x1. I wonder how you handle these predicates in Ready-Made. Presumably in Ready-Made there is only one level of events, so what does it mean for an event to rapli any number other than one? mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= =20 "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to=20 lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at=20 http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.