Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:60776) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRPb-0006dU-CC; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:47:05 -0800 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16sf747926vws.16 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:46:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:subject:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TD19T+jiEvUj5Ray6+Hzas3w3CfvpuGxGKRyWRpCBw0=; b=iqjZ80wegJJn7FBnvFf5n3SYDgVWPn+mSyf91KKf42Jo2i4T8XEnDcilrfaT35zZLF zFxpJ8RyaEh8nWTmQS8yQlTzxLoi3qZ8XuCE0zLydKJ0RzDVFwp24iLhn4uskvR2nN6i gdiqf/4l70qjprzzx2gwGq9nZ11Dkcq1Pk7yI= Received: by 10.52.188.99 with SMTP id fz3mr4716793vdc.19.1320680814279; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:46:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.237.8 with SMTP id k8ls11872458anh.2.gmail; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.233.33 with SMTP id f33mr2587390anh.3.1320680813006; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.233.33 with SMTP id f33mr2587389anh.3.1320680812992; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:46:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from nm28.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm28.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.237.93]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id r38si9176335ano.2.2011.11.07.07.46.52; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:46:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.93 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.93; Received: from [66.94.237.192] by nm28.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2011 15:46:52 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.115] by tm3.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2011 15:46:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1020.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2011 15:46:52 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 617586.51826.bm@omp1020.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 35963 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Nov 2011 15:46:52 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: zsVfhA8VM1l2csI0OfbmJ4hoZXfIr5Y37FhkNmQxOH1TdbG WkFPk6rMvmcqa5Y6vDrzUWWhYQwFSQQBcA4kbOTQx4bu.fZ8eqNPrP4T4H4f TL_24gUxkh_6moaMAnGvA6HuPO_CME_h_RX7mkF6zXZgbJ1.kasPNh9zuLmH ik4QMNMiJICV4AEXKt_nIqC7V_XAgvvj3_ToMLBYrxTOscZvn.cxY0rQqQCl SFYWP9ee_YyBOx8hiop7j4kH7uDH9ttj_.nV9vZRj2z0L5rP3Nr50bgDnjg2 ndw0DdZVRLOiu4hFWVuFRG3wG7PR7e65r8jFMNRZ9cyqFZYxR5ocKgi05zB3 Jz6IP7_M3PRwqx88oSkOnaC3afR4mx8Aei3YOIwysZgOeYaLMuYDzUkqh.Ib Kfron_WzkPn.DiQcOZ7TILWbxs9VA67kIiq7U8188GwM7r2o_ZJwk8sX77.l Yr_LI Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:46:52 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/574 YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 References: <20111106033146.GC2831@gonzales> <20111106182701.GA2703@gonzales> <20111106211140.GC2703@gonzales> <20111106221157.GE2703@gonzales> <20111107002553.GB17040@gonzales> <20111107023033.GC17040@gonzales> Message-ID: <1320680812.17012.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 07:46:52 -0800 (PST) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: <20111107023033.GC17040@gonzales> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / There seems to be a certain amount of confusing two (or several) more or le= ss=20 formally similar hierarchies here: token-type, kind-exemplar, set-subset (o= r=20 member) and I am unclear which ones we are really talking about (the fact t= hat I=20 tend to think of them as in fact the same system probably adds to my confus= ion=20 with people who don't). ----- Original Message ---- From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Sun, November 6, 2011 8:30:33 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural= =20 variable * Sunday, 2011-11-06 at 22:48 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > > * Sunday, 2011-11-06 at 19:42 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > >> > >> lo vi ranmapku cu mupli lo ranmapku noi mupli lo mapku noi mupli lo ta= xfu > >> > >> But I admit I became lost as to what we are after here. > > > > Assuming I'm guessing correctly what your various {lo} phrases are mean= t > > to refer to, that's only two levels in the sense I mean 'level'. > > > > "Some hats here are examples of Berets, which is an example* of Hats, > > which is an example* of Garments"? >=20 > (I avoid translating "lo" as "some". A bare plural, "the", or > sometimes "a" are all better. And together with "vi", "this" or > "these".) >=20 > So in more idiomatic English: >=20 > "This beret is an example of a beret, which is an example of a hat, > which is an example of a garment." >=20 > > You could use {klesi} for 'example*', so there's no level-crossing. >=20 > In my view, the x1 of klesi is at a different level than the x2, as in > mupli, and as in krefu. If you're really using klesi there, then I'm reading the english as "This beret is an example of a type of beret, which is an example of a type of hat, which is an example of a type of garment" (I write, as if this disambiguated at all... but hopefully you get what I mean). Then I don't think this is an example of level-crossing in the sense I mean it, i.e. crossing the level doesn't allow you to get from AE to EA. "Everyone was wearing a type of beret" -> "There was a type of beret everyone was wearing - namely a type of hat" doesn't (meta)work. > The difference between mupli and klesi seems to be that there may be > many equivalent mupli for the same se mupli, but two klesi of one se > klesi are not equivalent. Or something like that. Not with you there. What's equivalence? > > Beret is a subclass of Hat, not an instance. >=20 > I would hazard to say that "ro klesi be ko'a cu mupli ko'a". Weird. What's the relation between klesi and mupli? I was assuming that ro da poi klesi ku'o ro de zo'u go da de klesi gi ro di da na.a de mupli. Martin --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.