Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:54218)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCKH6vKekGBCLweD1BBoErDmYZQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RNTka-0007yI-Tv; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:16:59 -0800
Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4sf6210919gyg.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:16:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-originating-ip:subject:from:to
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=zjgh9MI/tV+wICFi+IoxaC0jHmLPB0L/eW9SwhwtKgw=;
        b=h8pLUghoYNL9nns/nG9oIXAKXlDEg19iZ18nJB9cRaSJW0kGIUTvaCdmdPCygEjr0d
         irPxkv8iDcGXAV6ZAv2FFnAjjTGcyfIcoscimFtEKpJe9JOg+TrhPJ/dRu/hIlOY0STm
         gl0QUHn6Ong4Dfxo9W+dPWx70nC7pKpxq4ZrI=
Received: by 10.236.77.37 with SMTP id c25mr6644763yhe.19.1320689803688;
        Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:16:43 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.101.2.12 with SMTP id e12ls12330923ani.3.gmail; Mon, 07 Nov
 2011 10:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.80.34 with SMTP id j22mr40172085yhe.5.1320689801861;
        Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.80.34 with SMTP id j22mr40172084yhe.5.1320689801851;
        Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fagricipni.com (fagricipni.com. [69.5.18.101])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id u30si4591722yhu.7.2011.11.07.10.16.41;
        Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of lojban707@fagricipni.com designates 69.5.18.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=69.5.18.101;
Received: (qmail 19493 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2011 18:16:40 -0000
X-Originating-IP: [67.58.190.131]
Subject: Re: [lojban] gender
From: "H. Felton" <lojban707@fagricipni.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <4EB81C9F.4090300@gmail.com>
References: <f880ddca-7f8d-4072-a4a7-4a11579143d1@gk10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
	 <201111062057.24471.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4EB73D68.8090506@gmail.com>
	 <201111062230.31412.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4EB7526A.2070508@gmail.com>
	 <CAKv2tT6Cgu0kFnMFPCNtg-2bFGtDf5nn11xotZTzWKqDzwwHmA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAKv2tT40aGDvOxywYCMkJS-WkE1K_H9fqS7OKd-=7Ujs=i3zFg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1320681459.44222.YahooMailRC@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	 <CAKv2tT7tTukzyKKCV7cK+MeCN3+zKFu-vD=PQRY_H4EABF9FGA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1320687357.85830.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	 <4EB81C9F.4090300@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:16:37 -0500
Message-ID: <1320689797.1887.4.camel@fagricipni-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1
X-Original-Sender: lojban707@fagricipni.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of lojban707@fagricipni.com designates
 69.5.18.101 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban707@fagricipni.com;
 domainkeys=pass header.From=lojban707@fagricipni.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

Why not use lujvo?

On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 11:59 -0600, vitci'i wrote:
> One gismu for all of them, with a place to specify which one you're
> talking about.
> 
> On 11/07/2011 11:35 AM, John E Clifford wrote:
> > Which "gender" should have a gismu? grammatical, phenotypic, social, cultural, 
> > intentional, genetic, ...




> > 2011/11/7 John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
> > 
> > Gloryoski!  Why should Lojban be able to sort out things that the experts in the 
> > field can't yet get straight?  Grammatical gender is defined by concordance and 
> > has, in a few languages, some more than casual relation to some physical 
> > features of the referents.  Other languages have derivational devices (other 
> > than concordance) to signal (somewhat more regularly) such physical features 
> > (along with others, e.g., size, age). Still others basically don't notice.  As 
> > for the features involved, the range is enormous.  And when you throw in genetic 
> > data or cultural norms or internal intentions, you pass well beyond what 
> > languages manage to deal with comfortably (or even uncomfortably).

Here, however, I think that using "cinse" is malglico; derive 
the words from "klesi" instead.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.