Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:53064) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNUKD-0008Gg-V5; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:53:49 -0800 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf4740974bka.16 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:53:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=n3/QBenl9NOx5F3hsM4InUb4bCKbyLHC3LdWlQmaFkE=; b=t3rRwEL0sG4XATjPkoVMeVWvwx4hThU5YMIybwN5UnxRo91Ma8RXeA+Y3aq6VEott8 uw95Al5k9cynVYg6f5rYp414sgfDNj5eYJcysYtSh0uyo9IlnC456ktxHQyiynvqpSkC 9h3p3el6IuXBTJlmF0Ea7h5wGjhrDL6nFfmWs= Received: by 10.205.125.18 with SMTP id gq18mr371731bkc.14.1320692011385; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:53:31 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.205.80.78 with SMTP id zt14ls16505633bkb.1.gmail; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.184.2 with SMTP id ci2mr3274011bkb.7.1320692010286; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.184.2 with SMTP id ci2mr3274010bkb.7.1320692010269; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j1si3320894bky.2.2011.11.07.10.53.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.49; Received: by mail-bw0-f49.google.com with SMTP id t2so6010499bka.36 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:53:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.77 with SMTP id n13mr2890532bkw.83.1320692010080; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.41.68 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:53:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111107124504.GV21492@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20110927064919.GX18099@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111002005717.GM20043@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111031053206.GC8858@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111101084840.GC15924@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111102053827.GF26004@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111106062046.GA21335@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111107124504.GV21492@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:53:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: More about the babies (was Re: [lojban] Help request: move things to github for me.) From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cf9b41e589404b1299260 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --0015175cf9b41e589404b1299260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Robin Lee Powell < rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > y. zo fa'u cu srana lo sumti .e nai zo mo (forgive the falling back into English) Respectively, I disagree. fa'u is a JOI, and as such, can connect either sumti or selbri. It is not limited to sumti as, say, termsets are. As such, it is perfectly valid to say "mi fa'u do cu xebni fa'u nelci la'o skin. Krull skin.", which devolves into two parallel assertions -> "mi xebni la'o skin. Krull skin." and "do nelci la'o skin. Krull skin." Or, "mi citka fa'u pinxe lo sparagusa ku fa'u lo djacu" (mi citka lo spragusa gi'e pinxe lo djacu) Or even: "mi morji fa'u tolmo'i ku'i lo du'u do pu nelci fa'u citka le cirla" (I remembered that liked the cheese but forgot that you ate it), although cutting into a sub-bridi like that might be a bit cheesy. --gejyspa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0015175cf9b41e589404b1299260 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Robin Lee Powell= <rlpow= ell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
y. zo fa'u cu srana lo sumti= .e nai zo mo
=A0
=A0 (forgive the falling back into English)
=A0 Respectively, I disagree.=A0 fa'u is a JOI, and as such, can c= onnect either sumti or selbri.=A0 It is not limited to sumti as, say, terms= ets are.=A0 As such, it is perfectly valid to say "mi fa'u do cu x= ebni fa'u nelci la'o skin. Krull skin.", which devolves into t= wo parallel assertions -> "mi xebni la'o skin. Krull skin."= ; and "do nelci la'o skin. Krull skin."=A0 Or, "mi citka= fa'u pinxe lo sparagusa ku=A0fa'u lo djacu" (mi citka lo spra= gusa gi'e pinxe lo djacu)=A0 Or even: "mi morji fa'u tolmo'= ;i ku'i lo du'u do pu nelci fa'u citka le cirla" (I rememb= ered that liked the cheese but forgot that you ate it), although cutting in= to a sub-bridi like that might be a bit cheesy.
=A0
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 --gejyspa
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015175cf9b41e589404b1299260--