Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:64293) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNfW8-0004i2-HM; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:50:48 -0800 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20sf157126wye.16 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:50:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=znXeNFatvnnXgA4994tAiZJjI4IYjJo0UC8Rtn8nqQs=; b=OwpcM1qTVZ3LVW6JJ7b1LkpO1HwbMMEFqHHeSyvefXsqMLUYopMWt/HdmB6QvUvVvz qWEBT/GM3FJsc05EyzbyBDViFUXHm2r3GCw9a7DFRZyeCt50JWK+ObjlwwFslxrf27yf bcgfZEE+Fosc+oXylmA99gxfa1p13ZH8MJV2U= Received: by 10.216.139.209 with SMTP id c59mr1092153wej.33.1320735033879; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:50:33 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.100.66 with SMTP id y42ls801656eef.0.canary; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.20.19 with SMTP id o19mr1578609eeo.15.1320735032845; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.20.19 with SMTP id o19mr1578608eeo.15.1320735032820; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p47si361550eeb.2.2011.11.07.22.50.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of so.cool.ogi@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.182; Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so164848eyd.27 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.5.148 with SMTP id 20mr2499539eel.105.1320735032562; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.97.77 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1320722048.69601.YahooMailRC@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <201111062057.24471.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4EB73D68.8090506@gmail.com> <201111062230.31412.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4EB7526A.2070508@gmail.com> <1320681459.44222.YahooMailRC@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1320687357.85830.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4EB81C9F.4090300@gmail.com> <1320689797.1887.4.camel@fagricipni-desktop> <4EB823B4.4080700@gmail.com> <4EB82487.1080608@gmail.com> <4EB82819.2010603@gmail.com> <35370FB6-7C1C-4B21-80EF-56F2213B58DE@yahoo.com> <4EB845AE.3080907@gmail.com> <1320722048.69601.YahooMailRC@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 07:50:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] gender From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_Fr=F6jd?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: so.cool.ogi@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of so.cool.ogi@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=so.cool.ogi@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d3482475538104b133967a X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --001636d3482475538104b133967a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I totally agree with John! So then back to lojban. Do you agree that it's reasonable to use terganti for biological sex (also your official sex, registered at the authorities) and tercinse for social constructed and/or self-identified/performative sexuality/gender? Grammatical gender is apparently just a special case of word classification and should presumably use something else than zilselgencinse or similar. Even if there are more factors than your gametes (shape of external genitalia, presence of ovary (also ganti), hormones) which define your biological sex, usually ganti is what governs those other factors, so that's why I think terganti is a good choice here. When it comes to tercinse I like the concept that sexual orientation and gender is mixed together and left vague. If you need to specify exactly what you mean you can do it with tanru or lujvo. /jongausib 2011/11/8 John E Clifford > Well, at least we have gotten grammar out. The remaining notions of > gender and > sex (and whatever other terms have come along to sort these out a bit) are > separate enough (though the terminology is not standardized yet) to start > getting away from the confusions that working with one or two terms raise. > To > be sure, for most people most of these notions run more or less together, > but > for a significant number they do not and it would seem ti desirab;e thing > to > sort them out eventually and not continue lumping them together into that > couple > of terms and their compounds (which often are based on rather disparaging > notions, alas). > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: vitci'i > To: lojban@googlegroups.com > Sent: Mon, November 7, 2011 2:55:10 PM > Subject: Re: [lojban] gender > > On 11/07/2011 02:29 PM, John E. Clifford wrote: > > But fosters the notion that these various concepts are somehow related > beyond > >the accidents of English vocabulary. > > But sociologically assigned gender, biological sex at birth, biological > sex constructed by surgery, personal identification, etc. *are* > entangled -- not identical, but not easily separable either, and if > nothing else then at least moderately-strongly correlated. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001636d3482475538104b133967a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I totally agree with John! So then back to lojban. Do you agree that it'= ;s reasonable to use terganti for biological sex (also your official sex, r= egistered at the authorities) and tercinse for social constructed and/or se= lf-identified/performative sexuality/gender? Grammatical gender is apparent= ly just a special case of word classification and should presumably use som= ething else than zilselgencinse or similar.

Even if there are more factors than your gametes (shape of external gen= italia, presence of ovary (also ganti), hormones) which define your biologi= cal sex, usually ganti is what governs those other factors, so that's w= hy I think terganti is a good choice here.
When it comes to tercinse I like the concept that sexual orientation and ge= nder is mixed together and left vague. If you need to specify exactly what = you mean you can do it with tanru or lujvo.
/jongausib

2011/11/8 John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com
>
Well, at least we have gotten grammar out. =A0The remaining= notions of gender and
sex (and whatever other terms have come along to sort these out a =A0bit) a= re
separate enough (though the terminology is not standardized yet) to start getting away from the confusions that working with one or two terms raise. = =A0To
be sure, for most people most of these notions run more or less together, b= ut
for a significant number they do not and it would seem ti desirab;e thing t= o
sort them out eventually and not continue lumping them together into that c= ouple
of terms and their compounds (which often are based on rather disparaging notions, alas).


----- Original Message ----
From: vitci'i <celes= tialcognition@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com<= br> Sent: Mon, November 7, 2011 2:55:10 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] gender

On 11/07/2011 02:29 PM, John E. Clifford wrote:
> But fosters the notion that these various concepts are somehow related= beyond
>the accidents of English vocabulary.

But sociologically assigned gender, biological sex at birth, biological
sex constructed by surgery, personal identification, etc. *are*
entangled -- not identical, but not easily separable either, and if
nothing else then at least moderately-strongly correlated.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
lojban+unsubscribe= @googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001636d3482475538104b133967a--